These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33935330)
1. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Haunschild R; Bornmann L Scientometrics; 2021; 126(6):5181-5199. PubMed ID: 33935330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends. Khademizadeh S; Danesh F; Esmaeili S; Lund B; Santos-d'Amorim K Account Res; 2023 Jun; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 37309726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The landscape of the characteristics, citations, scientific, technological, and altmetrics impacts of retracted papers in hematology. Panahi S; Soleimanpour S Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):363-378. PubMed ID: 34612782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A call for governments to pause Twitter censorship: using Twitter data as social-spatial sensors of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 research diffusion. Patel VM; Haunschild R; Bornmann L; Garas G Scientometrics; 2021; 126(4):3193-3207. PubMed ID: 33678927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COVID-19 retracted publications on retraction watch: A systematic survey of their pre-prints and citations. Syed Z; Syed F; Thabane L; Rodrigues M Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15184. PubMed ID: 37035368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions in Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences Journals: A Systematic Review. Kardeş S; Levack W; Özkuk K; Atmaca Aydın E; Seringeç Karabulut S Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 101(11):1980-1990. PubMed ID: 32402503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers. Capodici A; Salussolia A; Sanmarchi F; Gori D; Golinelli D Qual Quant; 2022 Nov; ():1-33. PubMed ID: 36466994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study. Pobiruchin M; Zowalla R; Wiesner M J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e19629. PubMed ID: 32790641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. Nogueira TE; Gonçalves AS; Leles CR; Batista AC; Costa LR BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jul; 10(1):253. PubMed ID: 28683764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of retracted research papers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furuse Y Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1288014. PubMed ID: 38269323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine. Chauvin A; De Villelongue C; Pateron D; Yordanov Y Eur J Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 26(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 28825929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To Tweet or Not to Tweet: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Media Use by Global Diabetes Researchers. Leigh S; Noble ME; Pearson FE; Iremonger J; Williams DT Pharmaceut Med; 2021 Nov; 35(6):353-365. PubMed ID: 34874534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamics of cross-platform attention to retracted papers. Peng H; Romero DM; Horvát EÁ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(25):e2119086119. PubMed ID: 35700358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retracted Publications in Orthopaedics: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends. Rai R; Sabharwal S J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):e44. PubMed ID: 28463926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis. Slavik CE; Buttle C; Sturrock SL; Darlington JC; Yiannakoulias N J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e24883. PubMed ID: 33651705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using altmetrics for detecting impactful research in quasi-zero-day time-windows: the case of COVID-19. Boetto E; Fantini MP; Gangemi A; Golinelli D; Greco M; Nuzzolese AG; Presutti V; Rallo F Scientometrics; 2021; 126(2):1189-1215. PubMed ID: 33424050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retracted Publications Within Radiology Journals. Rosenkrantz AB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 26797347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yeo-Teh NSL; Tang BL Account Res; 2021 Jan; 28(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 32573274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications. Hagberg JM J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 May; 128(5):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 32240014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature. Casadevall A; Steen RG; Fang FC FASEB J; 2014 Sep; 28(9):3847-55. PubMed ID: 24928194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]