These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33935892)

  • 1. Digital Detectives: Websleuthing Reduces Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in Police Lineups.
    Elphick C; Philpot R; Zhang M; Stuart A; Pike G; Strathie A; Havard C; Walkington Z; Frumkin LA; Levine M; Price BA; Bandara AK; Nuseibeh B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():640513. PubMed ID: 33935892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the reliability of eyewitness identifications from police lineups.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L; Dunn JC; Clark SE; Wells W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 26699467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of pre-event instructions on eyewitness identification.
    Baldassari MJ; Moore KN; Hyman IE; Hope L; Mah EY; Lindsay DS; Mansour J; Saraiva R; Horry R; Rath H; Kelly L; Jones R; Vale S; Lawson B; Pedretti J; Palma TA; Cruz F; Quarenta J; Van der Cruyssen I; Mileva M; Allen J; Jeye B; Wiechert S
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Feb; 8(1):16. PubMed ID: 36854842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mistaken eyewitness identification rates increase when either witnessing or testing conditions get worse.
    Smith AM; Wilford MM; Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 31144829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Valentine T
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2018 Aug; 24(3):307-325. PubMed ID: 30100702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.
    Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15571. PubMed ID: 36114219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.
    Wright DB; Stroud JN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups.
    Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.
    Hinz T; Pezdek K
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 11419382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Nov; 44(6):894-904. PubMed ID: 17666030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.