These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33937850)

  • 1. A Multisite Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Synthetic Mammography.
    Matthews TP; Singh S; Mombourquette B; Su J; Shah MP; Pedemonte S; Long A; Maffit D; Gurney J; Hoil RM; Ghare N; Smith D; Moore SM; Marks SC; Wahl RL
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2021 Jan; 3(1):e200015. PubMed ID: 33937850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Our experience using synthesized mammography vs full field digital mammography in population-based screening.
    Ahmadinejad N; Rasoulighasemlouei S; Rostamzadeh N; Arian A; Mohajeri A; Miratashi Yazdi SN
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2023; 10():100475. PubMed ID: 36647512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility.
    Murakami R; Uchiyama N; Tani H; Yoshida T; Kumita S
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100207. PubMed ID: 33102630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
    Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.
    Zuley ML; Guo B; Catullo VJ; Chough DM; Kelly AE; Lu AH; Rathfon GY; Lee Spangler M; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Bandos AI
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):664-71. PubMed ID: 24475859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer.
    Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Hahn SY; Shin JH; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2538-46. PubMed ID: 26628063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conspicuity of Screen-Detected Malignancies on Full Field Digital Mammography vs. Synthetic Mammography.
    Chikarmane SA; Yeh ED; Wang A; Ratanaprasatporn L; Giess CS
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):757-763. PubMed ID: 31307930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is There a Difference in the Diagnostic Outcomes of Calcifications Initially Identified on Synthetic Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening?
    Zhu H; Polat D; Evans P; Mootz A; Blackburn T; Xi Y; Dogan BE
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109365. PubMed ID: 33142193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lesion conspicuity on synthetic screening mammography compared to full field digital screening mammography.
    Giess CS; Raza S; Denison CM; Yeh ED; Gombos EC; Frost EP; Bay CP; Chikarmane SA
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Jul; 75():90-96. PubMed ID: 33508756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Mass Size Measurements: Synthesized Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Şendur HN; Cerit MN; Gültekin S; Cindil E; Kılıç P
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 31537507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep Learning Models for Automated Assessment of Breast Density Using Multiple Mammographic Image Types.
    Rigaud B; Weaver OO; Dennison JB; Awais M; Anderson BM; Chiang TD; Yang WT; Leung JWT; Hanash SM; Brock KK
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36291787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer.
    Nakajima E; Tsunoda H; Ookura M; Ban K; Kawaguchi Y; Inagaki M; Ikeda N; Furukawa K; Ishikawa T
    J Belg Soc Radiol; 2021; 105(1):63. PubMed ID: 34786534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Breast Density Between Synthesized Versus Standard Digital Mammography.
    Haider I; Morgan M; McGow A; Stein M; Rezvani M; Freer P; Hu N; Fajardo L; Winkler N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1430-1436. PubMed ID: 29907419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
    Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
    Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.