228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33937919)
1. Impact of Molecular Classification on Treatment Paradigms in Uterine Cancers.
Cosgrove CM; Barrington D; Backes FJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2021 May; 23(7):75. PubMed ID: 33937919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.
Bosse T; Nout RA; McAlpine JN; McConechy MK; Britton H; Hussein YR; Gonzalez C; Ganesan R; Steele JC; Harrison BT; Oliva E; Vidal A; Matias-Guiu X; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Gilks CB; Soslow RA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 May; 42(5):561-568. PubMed ID: 29505428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.
León-Castillo A; de Boer SM; Powell ME; Mileshkin LR; Mackay HJ; Leary A; Nijman HW; Singh N; Pollock PM; Bessette P; Fyles A; Haie-Meder C; Smit VTHBM; Edmondson RJ; Putter H; Kitchener HC; Crosbie EJ; de Bruyn M; Nout RA; Horeweg N; Creutzberg CL; Bosse T;
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(29):3388-3397. PubMed ID: 32749941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An NRG Oncology/GOG study of molecular classification for risk prediction in endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Cosgrove CM; Tritchler DL; Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rush CM; Lankes HA; Creasman WT; Miller DS; Ramirez NC; Geller MA; Powell MA; Backes FJ; Landrum LM; Timmers C; Suarez AA; Zaino RJ; Pearl ML; DiSilvestro PA; Lele SB; Goodfellow PJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 148(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 29132872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer.
Talhouk A; McConechy MK; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Senz J; Boyd N; Pike J; Anglesio M; Kwon JS; Karnezis AN; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
Cancer; 2017 Mar; 123(5):802-813. PubMed ID: 28061006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.
Timmerman S; Van Rompuy AS; Van Gorp T; Vanden Bempt I; Brems H; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Han SN; Neven P; Victoor J; Laenen A; Vergote I
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 31980219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a one-step genomics-based molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large Chinese population.
Kang N; Zhang X; Wang Z; Dai Y; Lu S; Su W; Gai F; Zhu C; Shen D; Wang J
Pathol Res Pract; 2024 Feb; 254():155152. PubMed ID: 38277742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta-analysis.
McAlpine JN; Chiu DS; Nout RA; Church DN; Schmidt P; Lam S; Leung S; Bellone S; Wong A; Brucker SY; Lee CH; Clarke BA; Huntsman DG; Bernardini MQ; Ngeow J; Santin AD; Goodfellow P; Levine DA; Köbel M; Kommoss S; Bosse T; Gilks CB; Talhouk A
Cancer; 2021 Jul; 127(14):2409-2422. PubMed ID: 33793971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of
Beinse G; Rance B; Just PA; Izac B; Letourneur F; Saidu NEB; Chouzenoux S; Nicco C; Goldwasser F; Batteux F; Durdux C; Chapron C; Pasmant E; Leroy K; Alexandre J; Borghese B
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):640-647. PubMed ID: 32169874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts.
Stelloo E; Nout RA; Osse EM; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IJ; Jobsen JJ; Lutgens LC; van der Steen-Banasik EM; Nijman HW; Putter H; Bosse T; Creutzberg CL; Smit VT
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Aug; 22(16):4215-24. PubMed ID: 27006490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molecular classification defines outcomes and opportunities in young women with endometrial carcinoma.
Britton H; Huang L; Lum A; Leung S; Shum K; Kale M; Burleigh A; Senz J; Yang W; McConechy M; Kommoss S; Brucker S; Talhouk A; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 30922603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical impact of endometrial cancer stratified by genetic mutational profiles, POLE mutation, and microsatellite instability.
Haruma T; Nagasaka T; Nakamura K; Haraga J; Nyuya A; Nishida T; Goel A; Masuyama H; Hiramatsu Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195655. PubMed ID: 29659608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical features of ProMisE groups identify different phenotypes of patients with endometrial cancer.
Raffone A; Travaglino A; Gabrielli O; Micheli M; Zuccalà V; Bitonti G; Camastra C; Gargiulo V; Insabato L; Zullo F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jun; 303(6):1393-1400. PubMed ID: 33754186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Timely Update of Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Classification in the Diagnosis and Risk Assessment of Endometrial Carcinomas.
Wang M; Hui P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Nov; 145(11):1367-1378. PubMed ID: 34673912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment options for molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer in 2023.
Karpel HC; Slomovitz B; Coleman RL; Pothuri B
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 35(3):270-278. PubMed ID: 36943683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reclassifying endometrial carcinomas with a combined morphological and molecular approach.
Carlson J; McCluggage WG
Curr Opin Oncol; 2019 Sep; 31(5):411-419. PubMed ID: 31261170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ATM immunohistochemistry as a potential marker for the differential diagnosis of no specific molecular profile subtype and POLE-mutation subtype endometrioid carcinoma.
Kitazono I; Kobayashi Y; Akahane T; Yamaguchi T; Yanazume S; Nohara S; Sakamoto I; Tabata K; Tasaki T; Kobayashi H; Tanimoto A
Pathol Res Pract; 2022 Feb; 230():153743. PubMed ID: 34954471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical factors as prognostic variables among molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer.
Kolehmainen A; Pasanen A; Tuomi T; Koivisto-Korander R; Bützow R; Loukovaara M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242733. PubMed ID: 33232359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecularly Classified Uterine FIGO Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinomas Show Distinctive Clinical Outcomes But Overlapping Morphologic Features.
Joehlin-Price A; Van Ziffle J; Hills NK; Ladwig N; Rabban JT; Garg K
Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 Mar; 45(3):421-429. PubMed ID: 33021522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretable deep learning model to predict the molecular classification of endometrial cancer from haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images: a combined analysis of the PORTEC randomised trials and clinical cohorts.
Fremond S; Andani S; Barkey Wolf J; Dijkstra J; Melsbach S; Jobsen JJ; Brinkhuis M; Roothaan S; Jurgenliemk-Schulz I; Lutgens LCHW; Nout RA; van der Steen-Banasik EM; de Boer SM; Powell ME; Singh N; Mileshkin LR; Mackay HJ; Leary A; Nijman HW; Smit VTHBM; Creutzberg CL; Horeweg N; Koelzer VH; Bosse T
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Feb; 5(2):e71-e82. PubMed ID: 36496303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
