These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33938126)

  • 1. Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters.
    MacAskill W; Hoffman B; Johnson MA; Sharpe GR; Mills DE
    Physiol Rep; 2021 Apr; 9(8):e14831. PubMed ID: 33938126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of catheter-mounted transducers for intra-oesophageal pressure recording in respiratory function tests.
    Peters RJ; Meijer JH; Kingma R; Scheffer GJ; Heethaar RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Sep; 36(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 10367438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vivo comparison of a catheter mounted pressure transducer system with conventional balloon catheters.
    Stell IM; Tompkins S; Lovell AT; Goldstone JC; Moxham J
    Eur Respir J; 1999 May; 13(5):1158-63. PubMed ID: 10414420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurements Obtained From Esophageal Balloon Catheters Are Affected by the Esophageal Balloon Filling Volume in Children With ARDS.
    Hotz JC; Sodetani CT; Van Steenbergen J; Khemani RG; Deakers TW; Newth CJ
    Respir Care; 2018 Feb; 63(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 29089460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability and Agreement of a Microtransducer and an Air-Filled Balloon Esophageal Catheter in the Monitoring of Esophageal Pressure.
    Augusto RM; Albuquerque AL; Jaeger T; de Carvalho CR; Caruso P
    Respir Care; 2017 Feb; 62(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 27729399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing respiratory function depends on mechanical characteristics of balloon catheters.
    Walterspacher S; Isaak L; Guttmann J; Kabitz HJ; Schumann S
    Respir Care; 2014 Sep; 59(9):1345-52. PubMed ID: 24381189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters.
    Fang JC; Hilden K; Tuteja AK; Peterson KA
    Dig Dis Sci; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1657-63. PubMed ID: 15573923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.
    Xiang X; Tu L; Zhang X; Xie X; Hou X
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 23384164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disposable balloon-based oesophageal motility catheters: comparison with solid-state transducers.
    Tutuian R; Agrawal A; Mainie I; Freeman J; Castell DO
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2005 Jun; 17(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 15916633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liquid- and air-filled catheters without balloon as an alternative to the air-filled balloon catheter for measurement of esophageal pressure.
    Beda A; Güldner A; Carvalho AR; Zin WA; Carvalho NC; Huhle R; Giannella-Neto A; Koch T; de Abreu MG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e103057. PubMed ID: 25247308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Cardiac Cycle Locating to Minimize the Influence of Cardiac Artifacts on Esophageal Pressure Measurement During Dynamic Occlusion Test.
    He X; Sun XM; Chen GQ; Yang YL; Shi ZH; Xu M; Zhou JX
    Respir Care; 2018 Feb; 63(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 29066585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Placement of a fine-bore rectal balloon catheter in the anal canal does not affect anal sphincter pressures: improving our understanding of physiological function with anal acoustic reflectometry.
    Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1626-1631. PubMed ID: 32770704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraurethral pressure recording. A comparison betwen tip-transducer catheters and open-end catheters with constant flow.
    Asmussen M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1976; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 944949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esophageal pressure measurements in cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
    Thomas AM; Turner RE; Tenholder MF
    Chest; 1997 Sep; 112(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 9315820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal range for transdiaphragmatic pressures during sniffs with catheter mounted transducers.
    Evans SA; Watson L; Cowley AJ; Johnston ID; Kinnear WJ
    Thorax; 1993 Jul; 48(7):750-3. PubMed ID: 8153926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS; Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 1606114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reevaluation of the balloon in gastrointestinal manometry.
    Wilkes PR; Hoskin RW; Semlacher EA; MacCannell KL; Tyberg JV
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 Sep; 72(9):979-84. PubMed ID: 7842396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting the dynamic response of a commercial esophageal balloon-catheter.
    Cross TJ; Beck KC; Johnson BD
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Aug; 121(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 27402558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Good urodynamic practice: Pressure signal quality immediately after catheter insertion for cystometry with a water-filled pressure transducer system and its relevance for the ICS zero procedure.
    Rosier PFWM
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Jan; 40(1):319-325. PubMed ID: 33141486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure with a single gastric-esophageal probe.
    Gilbert R; Peppi D; Auchincloss JH
    J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol; 1979 Sep; 47(3):628-30. PubMed ID: 533758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.