BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33938648)

  • 1. A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Choe YH; Kim SM; Kim EK; Lee M; Park SJ; Ahn J; Carriere KC
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1266-1278. PubMed ID: 33938648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
    Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
    Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation.
    Gaspar T; Adawi S; Sachner R; Asmer I; Ganaeem M; Rubinshtein R; Shiran A
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jul; 25(7):749-57. PubMed ID: 22613774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of stenotic aortic valve area: a comparative study.
    Dimitriou P; Kähäri A; Emilsson K; Thunberg P
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):995-1003. PubMed ID: 22983258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Blot-Souletie N; Hébrard A; Acar P; Carrié D; Puel J
    Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Okura H; Yoshida K; Hozumi T; Akasaka T; Yoshikawa J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 30(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 9283536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a complementary method to transthoracic echocardiography for aortic valve area estimation in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Repanas TI; Papanastasiou CA; Efthimiadis GK; Fragkakis N; Sachpekidis V; Klein RM; Karvounis H; Karamitsos TD
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2021; 62(2):107-111. PubMed ID: 32535246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Adriaans BP; Westenberg JJM; van Cauteren YJM; Gerretsen S; Elbaz MSM; Bekkers SCAM; Veenstra LF; Crijns HJGM; Wildberger JE; Schalla S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 51(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 31257647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic Valve Planimetry in Aortic Stenosis Quantification: Reliability of Three-Dimensional-Multiplane Reconstruction and Comparison With Established Methods.
    Blaser I; Papadis A; Kassar M; Nozica N; Gräni C; Seiler C; de Marchi S; Buffle E
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 211():287-290. PubMed ID: 37952755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.
    Goland S; Trento A; Iida K; Czer LS; De Robertis M; Naqvi TZ; Tolstrup K; Akima T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 17488766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis.
    de la Morena G; Saura D; Oliva MJ; Soria F; González J; García M; Moreno V; Bonaque JC; Valdés M
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Jan; 11(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19805413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.