These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33939307)

  • 1. Study specific prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A tutorial: Prediction intervals in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; Schmid CH; Svensson D; Jackson D
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):429-447. PubMed ID: 33939307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequentist performances of Bayesian prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis.
    Hamaguchi Y; Noma H; Nagashima K; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
    Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):394-405. PubMed ID: 33164247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
    Jackson D; Bowden J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis prediction intervals are under reported in sport and exercise medicine.
    Borg DN; Impellizzeri FM; Borg SJ; Hutchins KP; Stewart IB; Jones T; Baguley BJ; Orssatto LBR; Bach AJE; Osborne JO; McMaster BS; Buhmann RL; Bon JJ; Barnett AG
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2024 Mar; 34(3):e14603. PubMed ID: 38501202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A random effects meta-analysis model with Box-Cox transformation.
    Yamaguchi Y; Maruo K; Partlett C; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):109. PubMed ID: 28724350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
    Partlett C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter JR; Binder H; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 20656692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models.
    Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():103. PubMed ID: 25196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How trace plots help interpret meta-analysis results.
    Röver C; Rindskopf D; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):413-429. PubMed ID: 38100240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias correction for multiple covariate analysis using empirical bayesian estimation in mixed-effects models for longitudinal data.
    Li Y; Yang Y; Xu XS; Yuan M;
    Comput Biol Chem; 2022 Aug; 99():107697. PubMed ID: 35636264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses.
    Guddat C; Grouven U; Bender R; Skipka G
    Syst Rev; 2012 Jul; 1():34. PubMed ID: 22839660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple method to estimate prediction intervals and predictive distributions: Summarizing meta-analyses beyond means and confidence intervals.
    Wang CC; Lee WC
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):255-266. PubMed ID: 30835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases.
    Friede T; Röver C; Wandel S; Neuenschwander B
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):658-671. PubMed ID: 27754556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.