BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33939839)

  • 1. Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests.
    Golmakani MK; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL
    Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):1244-1256. PubMed ID: 33939839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A semiparametric censoring bias model for estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test under dependent censoring.
    Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 23383717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical Methods for Estimating the Cumulative Risk of Screening Mammography Outcomes.
    Hubbard RA; Ripping TM; Chubak J; Broeders MJ; Miglioretti DL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Mar; 25(3):513-20. PubMed ID: 26721668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.
    Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Smith RA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Oct; 19(5):429-49. PubMed ID: 20356857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates?
    Braithwaite D; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller B; Dittus K; Moore D; Wernli KJ; Mandelblatt J; Kerlikowske K;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 23385442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.
    Hubbard RA; Kerlikowske K; Flowers CI; Yankaskas BC; Zhu W; Miglioretti DL
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):481-92. PubMed ID: 22007042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cumulative risk of a false-positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway.
    Tsuruda KM; Larsen M; Román M; Hofvind S
    Cancer; 2022 Apr; 128(7):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 34931707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cumulative risk of false positive test in relation to breast symptoms in mammography screening: a historical prospective cohort study.
    Singh D; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N; Anttila A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Sep; 159(2):305-13. PubMed ID: 27496148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cumulative false-positive risk of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.
    Kemp Jacobsen K; Abraham L; Buist DS; Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Vejborg I; Von Euler-Chelpin M; Njor SH
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 39(4):656-63. PubMed ID: 26013768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic screening interval in relation to tumor characteristics and false-positive risk by race/ethnicity and age.
    O'Meara ES; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Braithwaite D; Kerlikowske K; Dittus KL; Geller B; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL
    Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3959-67. PubMed ID: 24037812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cumulative risk of false-positive screening results across screening centres in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Roman M; Skaane P; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1639-44. PubMed ID: 24972452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
    Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
    Roman M; Hubbard RA; Sebuodegard S; Miglioretti DL; Castells X; Hofvind S
    Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3952-8. PubMed ID: 23963877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cumulative risks of false positive recall and screen-detected breast cancer after multiple screening examinations.
    Kregting LM; van Ravesteyn NT; Chootipongchaivat S; Heijnsdijk EAM; Otten JDM; Broeders MJM; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2023 Jul; 153(2):312-319. PubMed ID: 37038266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.