These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33940733)

  • 1. Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment.
    González-Quintero R; Bolívar-Vergara DM; Chirinda N; Arango J; Pantevez H; Barahona-Rosales R; Sánchez-Pinzón MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145573. PubMed ID: 33940733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of carbon footprint of milk production and identification of its major determinants in smallholder dairy farms in Karnataka, India.
    Mech A; Devi GL; Sivaram M; Sirohi S; Dhali A; Kolte AP; Malik PK; Veeranna RK; Niketha L; Bhatta R
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Dec; 106(12):8847-8860. PubMed ID: 37641313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
    O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The carbon footprint of integrated milk production and renewable energy systems - A case study.
    Vida E; Tedesco DEA
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1286-1294. PubMed ID: 28793397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.
    Ledgard SF; Falconer SJ; Abercrombie R; Philip G; Hill JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):1031-1046. PubMed ID: 31759588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.
    Feyissa AA; Senbeta F; Diriba D; Tolera A
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Dec; 54(6):411. PubMed ID: 36456660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.
    Laca A; Gómez N; Laca A; Díaz M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1650-1666. PubMed ID: 31755063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
    Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
    Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
    Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance.
    O'Brien D; Hennessy T; Moran B; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Oct; 98(10):7394-407. PubMed ID: 26254524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
    Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: A life cycle analysis.
    Uddin ME; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5074-5083. PubMed ID: 35346477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of South German dairy farms.
    Robert Kiefer L; Menzel F; Bahrs E
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():11-8. PubMed ID: 25602922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
    Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diversification not specialization reduces global and local environmental burdens from livestock production.
    Soteriades AD; Foskolos A; Styles D; Gibbons JM
    Environ Int; 2019 Nov; 132():104837. PubMed ID: 31450105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study.
    Kumar R; Singh G; Rani E
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2023 Jun; 55(4):236. PubMed ID: 37306726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing farm size is an effective way to decrease the carbon footprint in dairy cattle production.
    Aydin O; Koknaroglu H
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2023 Nov; 55(6):421. PubMed ID: 38010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study.
    Arcila S; Correa N; Pachón S; Valderrama LGA; Cano-Londoño NA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Sep; 31(43):55720-55735. PubMed ID: 39243329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.
    Capper JL; Cady RA
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31622980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.