These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33941458)

  • 21. Solitary and small (≤3 mm) apical positive surgical margins are related to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    May M; Brookman-May S; Weißbach L; Herbst H; Gilfrich C; Papadopoulos T; Roigas J; Hofstädter F; Wieland WF; Burger M
    Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21342298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
    World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term Oncologic Impact of Positive Anterior and Posterior Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Wu S; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Lu J; Subtelny AO; Wang Z; Olumi AF; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Wu CL
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):872-879. PubMed ID: 33002923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker?
    Saether T; Sørlien LT; Viset T; Lydersen S; Angelsen A
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 18752153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
    Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Preisser F; Mazzone E; Knipper S; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Shariat SF; Tian Z; Saad F; Montorsi F; Zorn KC; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e130-e139. PubMed ID: 30366880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.
    Rouanne M; Rode J; Campeggi A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 23883410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
    Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
    Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomised Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy Alone in Prostate Cancer Patients with Positive Margins or Extracapsular Extension.
    Hackman G; Taari K; Tammela TL; Matikainen M; Kouri M; Joensuu T; Luukkaala T; Salonen A; Isotalo T; Pétas A; Hendolin N; Boström PJ; Aaltomaa S; Lehtoranta K; Hellström P; Riikonen J; Korpela M; Minn H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL; Pukkala E; Hemminki A;
    Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 31375279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
    BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.