These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33941589)

  • 41. Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data.
    Kratz JE; Strasser C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117619. PubMed ID: 25706992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Publication and citation analysis of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology over a 10-year period: the evolution of an ophthalmology journal.
    Chou CY; Chew SS; Patel DV; Ormonde SE; McGhee CNj
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):868-73. PubMed ID: 20092596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Who owns what I say? Oral presentations, scientific publications, and 'the times'.
    Parrish R
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Sep; 112(9):1157-8. PubMed ID: 8085959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A personal journal journey.
    Rosen ES
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1401-2. PubMed ID: 25135528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
    Kramer MS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Avoiding errors in the medical literature: an editor's perspective.
    Waalen J
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Nov; 45(5):672-3. PubMed ID: 24139783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Rethinking peer review.
    Young K
    CMAJ; 2010 Feb; 182(3):281. PubMed ID: 20176769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tracker is a boon for innovation in peer review.
    Nature; 2019 Mar; 567(7746):5. PubMed ID: 30837738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Scientific publications in cancer: in Latin America, strong scientific networks increase productivity (the TENJIN study).
    Ruiz-Patiño A; Cardona AF; Arrieta O; Rolfo C; Gómez HL; Raez LE; Lopes G; Zatarain-Barrón ZL; Ricaurte L; Zamudio-Molano N; Rangel V; Oviedo J; Solano MP; Rojas L; Corrales L; Martín C; Mas L; Cuello M; Barrón F; Otero J; Carranza H; Vargas C; Rosell R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():1-8. PubMed ID: 32540384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Iovs 2008-2012.
    Kaufman PL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 53(13):8238-9. PubMed ID: 23230304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The American Journal of Ophthalmology, Not an "American" Journal of Ophthalmology.
    Parrish RK; Duncan Powers SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 180():xiii-xiv. PubMed ID: 28666515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Science Matters.
    McLeod SD
    Ophthalmology; 2022 Mar; 129(3):248-249. PubMed ID: 35190093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine.
    Eldredge JD
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1997 Oct; 85(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 9431432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How to identify peer-reviewed publications: Open-identity labels in scholarly book publishing.
    Kulczycki E; Rozkosz EA; Engels TCE; Guns R; Hołowiecki M; Pölönen J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214423. PubMed ID: 30908515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What do we know about peer review?
    Wessely S
    Psychol Med; 1996 Sep; 26(5):883-6. PubMed ID: 8878322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Predatory Publishing in Ophthalmology: A Call for Awareness and Action.
    Bakri SJ; Shah SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 221():207-210. PubMed ID: 32800829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect: The Continuing Evolution of the Peer Review Process.
    Bartley GB; Liesegang TJ
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Oct; 122(10):1958-9. PubMed ID: 26398048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications.
    Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Sep; 112(9):1485-6. PubMed ID: 16139664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Concerns about authorship and bias in scientific publications.
    Moser M
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2006 Sep; 8(9):613-4. PubMed ID: 16957421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.