These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33942082)

  • 1. Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Su G; Benjamínsson BH; Jóhannesson G; Guldbrandtsen B
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 99(7):. PubMed ID: 33942082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
    Jenko J; Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Eaglen SAE; Luff WGL; Bichard M; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):439-452. PubMed ID: 27837974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Milk Production Traits in Philippine Dairy Buffaloes.
    Herrera JRV; Flores EB; Duijvesteijn N; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():682576. PubMed ID: 34777455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Mehrban H; Lee D; Park MN
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
    Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison on genomic prediction using pedigree BLUP and single step GBLUP through the Hanwoo full-sib family.
    Kim EH; Kang HC; Myung CH; Kim JY; Sun DW; Lee DH; Lee SH; Lim HT
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 37170517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.