BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33942780)

  • 1. Protective effects of hydrogen gas inhalation on radiation-induced bone marrow damage in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study.
    Hirano SI; Aoki Y; Li XK; Ichimaru N; Takahara S; Takefuji Y
    Med Gas Res; 2021; 11(3):104-109. PubMed ID: 33942780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective dosimetric and clinical comparison of acute hematological toxicities in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in carcinoma cervix.
    Avinash HU; Arul Ponni TR; Janaki MG; Kirthi Koushik AS; Kumar SM
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 25879342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlations Between Radiation Dose in Bone Marrow and Hematological Toxicity in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT, and RapidARC.
    Chang Y; Yang ZY; Li GL; Li Q; Yang Q; Fan JQ; Zhao YC; Song YQ; Wu G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):770-6. PubMed ID: 26844613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Hui B; Zhang Y; Shi F; Wang J; Wang T; Wang J; Yuan W; Li Y; Liu Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Nov; 24(9):1648-52. PubMed ID: 25275663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dosimetric analysis of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with bone marrow sparing for cervical cancer.
    Murakami N; Okamoto H; Kasamatsu T; Kobayashi K; Harada K; Kitaguchi M; Sekii S; Takahashi K; Yoshio K; Inaba K; Morota M; Sumi M; Toita T; Ito Y; Itami J
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5091-8. PubMed ID: 25202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A randomized study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three dimensional conformal radiation therapy for pelvic radiation in patients of post-operative treatment with gynecologic malignant tumor].
    Ni J; Yin ZM; Yuan SH; Liu NF; Li L; Xu XX; Lou HM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):168-174. PubMed ID: 28355688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
    Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk.
    Ahmed RS; Kim RY; Duan J; Meleth S; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 15380585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective study of functional bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for pelvic malignancies.
    Liang Y; Bydder M; Yashar CM; Rose BS; Cornell M; Hoh CK; Lawson JD; Einck J; Saenz C; Fanta P; Mundt AJ; Bydder GM; Mell LK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):406-14. PubMed ID: 22687195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the incidence of the hematologic toxicity of patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Huang J; Gu F; Ji T; Zhao J; Li G
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):180. PubMed ID: 32727497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of atlas-based active bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy for cervical cancer.
    Li N; Noticewala SS; Williamson CW; Shen H; Sirak I; Tarnawski R; Mahantshetty U; Hoh CK; Moore KL; Mell LK
    Radiother Oncol; 2017 May; 123(2):325-330. PubMed ID: 28528206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tomotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer might increase bone marrow toxicity in comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Wang Y; Xiao Q; Zeng B; Ni Q; Liu X; Liu X; Tian L; Sheng C; Peng L; Wang H
    Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):e6-e12. PubMed ID: 31176536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A methodology for incorporating functional bone marrow sparing in IMRT planning for pelvic radiation therapy.
    McGuire SM; Menda Y; Ponto LL; Gross B; Juweid M; Bayouth JE
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Apr; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21397965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin For Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer: An International Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial (INTERTECC-2).
    Mell LK; Sirák I; Wei L; Tarnawski R; Mahantshetty U; Yashar CM; McHale MT; Xu R; Honerkamp-Smith G; Carmona R; Wright M; Williamson CW; Kasaová L; Li N; Kry S; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Schwarz J; Lowenstein J; Jiang SB; Saenz CC; Plaxe S; Einck J; Khorprasert C; Koonings P; Harrison T; Shi M; Mundt AJ;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(3):536-545. PubMed ID: 28126303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose to bone marrow using IMRT techniques in prostate cancer patients.
    Gershkevitsh E; Clark CH; Staffurth J; Dearnaley DP; Trott KR
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Mar; 181(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 15756521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relations between doses cumulated in bone marrow and dose delivery techniques during radiation therapy of cervical and endometrial cancer.
    Jodda A; Urbański B; Piotrowski T; Malicki J
    Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():54-59. PubMed ID: 28410686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 2 contouring methods of bone marrow on CT and correlation with hematological toxicities in non-bone marrow-sparing pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin for cervical cancer.
    Mahantshetty U; Krishnatry R; Chaudhari S; Kanaujia A; Engineer R; Chopra S; Shrivastava S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1427-34. PubMed ID: 22932264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Treatment of Pelvic Locoregional Recurrence of Cervical Cancer After Radical Surgery With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared With Conventional Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.
    Yin YJ; Li HQ; Sheng XG; Du XL; Wang C; Lu CH; Pan CX
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 25647254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical study of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with three-dimensional brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with advanced cervical cancer].
    Du XX; Yang H; Zhang HJ; Li LA; Fan WS; Meng YG
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 52(10):679-686. PubMed ID: 29060966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of the application among intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 3D-conformal radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer].
    Zhang C; Dong J; Shen T; Li Y; Yang Z; Cheng X; Luo H; Yang J; Shi Z; Wang W; Zhang X
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 30588595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.