These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33945162)

  • 1. Collective Reflective Equilibrium in Practice (CREP) and controversial novel technologies.
    Savulescu J; Gyngell C; Kahane G
    Bioethics; 2021 Sep; 35(7):652-663. PubMed ID: 33945162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Moral Machine experiment.
    Awad E; Dsouza S; Kim R; Schulz J; Henrich J; Shariff A; Bonnefon JF; Rahwan I
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):59-64. PubMed ID: 30356211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deliberately prejudiced self-driving vehicles elicit the most outrage.
    De Freitas J; Cikara M
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104555. PubMed ID: 33370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moral reasoning behind the veil of ignorance: An investigation into perspective-taking accessibility in the context of autonomous vehicles.
    Bruno G; Spoto A; Sarlo M; Lotto L; Marson A; Cellini N; Cutini S
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Feb; 115(1):90-114. PubMed ID: 37632706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory study.
    Budić M; Galjak M; Rakić V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Dec; 22(1):163. PubMed ID: 34886854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles.
    Dubljević V
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2461-2472. PubMed ID: 32632784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Should Autonomous Cars Drive? A Preference for Defaults in Moral Judgments Under Risk and Uncertainty.
    Meder B; Fleischhut N; Krumnau NC; Waldmann MR
    Risk Anal; 2019 Feb; 39(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 30157299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doubting Driverless Dilemmas.
    De Freitas J; Anthony SE; Censi A; Alvarez GA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(5):1284-1288. PubMed ID: 32735472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency or equality? The utilitarianism-egalitarianism trade-off determines carbon allocation preference.
    Huang L; Liu L; Dang J; Wei C; Miao X
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Apr; 63(2):745-766. PubMed ID: 38010867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ethical canary: narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting.
    Charlton V; DiStefano MJ
    J Med Ethics; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38373831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The justificatory power of moral experience.
    van Thiel GJ; van Delden JJ
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):234-7. PubMed ID: 19332580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: an empirical study.
    Sui T
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1229245. PubMed ID: 38090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theoretical and practical problems with wide reflective equilibrium in bioethics.
    Strong C
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 31(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 20358405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Libertarian paternalism and health care policy: a deliberative proposal.
    Schiavone G; De Anna G; Mameli M; Rebba V; Boniolo G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2014 Feb; 17(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 23846550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior.
    Martin R; Kusev P; van Schaik P
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104666. PubMed ID: 33930784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China.
    Wang K; Li G; Chen J; Long Y; Chen T; Chen L; Xia Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105692. PubMed ID: 32717413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Immoral Machine.
    Harris J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jan; 29(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31581972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People are averse to machines making moral decisions.
    Bigman YE; Gray K
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():21-34. PubMed ID: 30107256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparing popular views for inclusion in a reflective equilibrium: A case study on illness severity.
    Jølstad B; Stenmarck MS; Barra M
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 May; 348():116794. PubMed ID: 38555745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible.
    Tigard DW
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Jul; 30(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 34109925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.