These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33945162)
41. An ethical framework for evaluation of public health plans: a systematic process for legitimate and fair decision-making. Akrami F; Zali A; Abbasi M; Majdzadeh R; Karimi A; Fadavi M; Mehrabi Bahar A Public Health; 2018 Nov; 164():30-38. PubMed ID: 30170266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine. Ebbesen M; Pedersen BD Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Mar; 10(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 16955345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Egalitarianism and moral bioenhancement. Sparrow R Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(4):20-8. PubMed ID: 24730485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Why Procreative Preferences May be Moral - And Why it May not Matter if They Aren't. Saunders B Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):499-506. PubMed ID: 25655693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ethics in critical care in nursing. McCann JM Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 2(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 2357305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support. Hurst KF; Sintov ND Front Psychol; 2022; 13():976023. PubMed ID: 36337556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The Moral Authority of Consensus. Walker P; Lovat T J Med Philos; 2022 Aug; 47(3):443-456. PubMed ID: 35751628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence. Bonnefon JF; Rahwan I; Shariff A Annu Rev Psychol; 2024 Jan; 75():653-675. PubMed ID: 37722750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation. De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. From public preferences to ethical policy. Savulescu J; Kahane G; Gyngell C Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 3(12):1241-1243. PubMed ID: 31451736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Prevalence of principled thinking by critical care nurses. Corley MC; Selig P Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1994; 13(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8125034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The ethics of 'public understanding of ethics'--why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients' voices. Schicktanz S; Schweda M; Wynne B Med Health Care Philos; 2012 May; 15(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 21448745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles. Resnik DB; Andrews SL AI Ethics; 2024 May; 4(2):403-418. PubMed ID: 38770187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles. Frank DA; Chrysochou P; Mitkidis P; Ariely D Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13080. PubMed ID: 31511560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Disagreement over vaccination programmes: deep or merely complex and why does it matter? Dare T HEC Forum; 2014 Mar; 26(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 24129703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Personal ethical settings for driverless cars and the utility paradox: An ethical analysis of public attitudes in UK and Japan. Takaguchi K; Kappes A; Yearsley JM; Sawai T; Wilkinson DJC; Savulescu J PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0275812. PubMed ID: 36378636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Ethical manipulations: an ethical evaluation of the debate surrounding genetic engineering. van Tongeren PJ Hum Gene Ther; 1991; 2(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 1863642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]