These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33945581)
21. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer. Moon JY; Cho SC; Kim HJ; Jun RM; Han KE Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 35766049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Refractive prediction error in cataract surgery using an optical biometer equipped with anterior segment OCT. Kato Y; Kojima T; Tamaoki A; Ichikawa K; Tamura K; Ichikawa K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Apr; 48(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 34417778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis. Kanclerz P; Hecht I; Tuuminen R BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):182. PubMed ID: 37101115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients. Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position with Angle-to-Angle Depth Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. Goto S; Maeda N; Koh S; Ohnuma K; Hayashi K; Iehisa I; Noda T; Nishida K Ophthalmology; 2016 Dec; 123(12):2474-2480. PubMed ID: 27769585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers-IOLMaster 700 and Anterion. Langenbucher A; Szentmáry N; Cayless A; Wendelstein J; Hoffmann P Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):999-1010. PubMed ID: 36307658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature. Zhang C; Dai G; Pazo EE; Xu L; Wu X; Zhang H; Lin T; He W PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241630. PubMed ID: 33216749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound. González-Godínez S; Saucedo-Urdapilleta R; Mayorquín-Ruiz M; Velasco-Barona C; Moragrega-Adame E; Domínguez-Varela IA; Gonzalez-Salinas R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 70(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 34937218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction. Fram NR; Masket S; Wang L Ophthalmology; 2015 Jun; 122(6):1096-101. PubMed ID: 25766733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer. Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Balducci N; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32050229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry. Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):859-865. PubMed ID: 27793471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of pupil dilation on biometry measurements with partial coherence interferometry and its effect on IOL power formula calculation. Rodriguez-Raton A; Jimenez-Alvarez M; Arteche-Limousin L; Mediavilla-Peña E; Larrucea-Martinez I Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25655597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Refractive Prediction Accuracy With Three Optical Devices. Cheng SM; Li X; Zhang JS; Mei JQ; Shi GL; Lin J; Li TT; Yu AY J Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 36630430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of partial coherence interferometry in patients with large inter-eye axial length difference. Petersen CA; Terveen DC; Quist T; Taravati P; Ding L; Oetting TA; Chen PP PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246721. PubMed ID: 33561129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation. Hui S; Yi L Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intraoperative Aberrometry Versus Preoperative Biometry for IOL Power Selection After Radial Keratotomy: A Prospective Study. Curado SX; Hida WT; Vilar CMC; Ordones VL; Chaves MAP; Tzelikis PF J Refract Surg; 2019 Oct; 35(10):656-661. PubMed ID: 31610007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association of refractive outcome with postoperative anterior chamber depth measured with 3 optical biometers. Mao Y; Li J; Qin Y; Xu Y; Liu L; Cheng H; Wu M Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 44(1):62. PubMed ID: 38345699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]