These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33945972)

  • 41. Unified method for the total pore volume and pore size distribution of hierarchical zeolites from argon adsorption and mercury intrusion.
    Kenvin J; Jagiello J; Mitchell S; Pérez-Ramírez J
    Langmuir; 2015 Feb; 31(4):1242-7. PubMed ID: 25603366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pore structure analysis of swollen dextran-methacrylate hydrogels by SEM and mercury intrusion porosimetry.
    Kim SH; Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 10813766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamic aspects of mercury porosimetry: a lattice model study.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA
    Langmuir; 2005 Mar; 21(7):3179-86. PubMed ID: 15780002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. MF-DFT and experimental investigations of the origins of hysteresis in mercury porosimetry of silica materials.
    Rigby SP; Chigada PI
    Langmuir; 2010 Jan; 26(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 19670898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Improved algorithm for estimating pore size distribution from pore space images of porous media.
    Song S; Ding Q; Wei J
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Nov; 100(5-1):053314. PubMed ID: 31869964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An integrated pore size distribution measurement method of small angle neutron scattering and mercury intrusion capillary pressure.
    Shen R; Zhang X; Ke Y; Xiong W; Guo H; Liu G; Zhou H; Yang H
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17458. PubMed ID: 34465837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Three-dimensional pore characterization of intact loess and compacted loess with micron scale computed tomography and mercury intrusion porosimetry.
    Zhang L; Qi S; Ma L; Guo S; Li Z; Li G; Yang J; Zou Y; Li T; Hou X
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8511. PubMed ID: 32444623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A statistical model for the heterogeneous structure of porous catalyst pellets.
    Rigby SP; Daut S
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 98(2):87-119. PubMed ID: 12144099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Particle and pore size distributions of investments.
    Mueller HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 3020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Simulation of nonwetting phase entrapment within porous media using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Watt-Smith MJ; Rigby SP; Chudek JA; Fletcher RS
    Langmuir; 2006 May; 22(11):5180-8. PubMed ID: 16700611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characterization of polymer-based monolithic capillary columns by inverse size-exclusion chromatography and mercury-intrusion porosimetry.
    Urban J; Eeltink S; Jandera P; Schoenmakers PJ
    J Chromatogr A; 2008 Feb; 1182(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18206896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Review of pore network modelling of porous media: Experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport.
    Xiong Q; Baychev TG; Jivkov AP
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():101-117. PubMed ID: 27442725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modeling Oil Recovery for Mixed Macro- and Micro-Pore Carbonate Grainstones.
    Xu Y; Li Q; King HE
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9780. PubMed ID: 28851934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Porous structure of ion exchange membranes investigated by various techniques.
    Kononenko N; Nikonenko V; Grande D; Larchet C; Dammak L; Fomenko M; Volfkovich Y
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2017 Aug; 246():196-216. PubMed ID: 28511788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Classifications of the Reservoir Space of Tight Sandstone Based on Pore Structure, Connectivity, and Fractal Character: A Case Study from the Chang 7 Member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin, China.
    Wang W; Li W; Xu S
    ACS Omega; 2022 Mar; 7(12):10627-10637. PubMed ID: 35382309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Capillary condensation hysteresis in overlapping spherical pores: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Gor GY; Rasmussen CJ; Neimark AV
    Langmuir; 2012 Aug; 28(33):12100-7. PubMed ID: 22823524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Modeling mercury porosimetry using statistical mechanics.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA; Thommes M
    Langmuir; 2004 Jul; 20(15):6482-9. PubMed ID: 15248740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Angstrom-to-millimeter characterization of sedimentary rock microstructure.
    Radlinski AP; Ioannidis MA; Hinde AL; Hainbuchner M; Baron M; Rauch H; Kline SR
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Jun; 274(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 15144836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Partitioning of habitable pore space in earthworm burrows.
    Gorres JH; Amador JA
    J Nematol; 2010 Mar; 42(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 22736839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pore size distributions convolution for microtomographic images applied to Shark Bay's oolite.
    Dos Reis PJ; Nagata R; Appoloni CR
    Micron; 2017 Jul; 98():49-54. PubMed ID: 28371728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.