BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33946269)

  • 1. Validation of Adhesive Single-Lead ECG Device Compared with Holter Monitoring among Non-Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
    Kwon S; Lee SR; Choi EK; Ahn HJ; Song HS; Lee YS; Oh S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33946269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.
    Barrett PM; Komatireddy R; Haaser S; Topol S; Sheard J; Encinas J; Fought AJ; Topol EJ
    Am J Med; 2014 Jan; 127(1):95.e11-7. PubMed ID: 24384108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor - Cardiostat™ - Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring.
    Nault I; André P; Plourde B; Leclerc F; Sarrazin JF; Philippon F; O'Hara G; Molin F; Steinberg C; Roy K; Blier L; Champagne J
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 53():57-63. PubMed ID: 30641305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study.
    Kwon S; Lee SR; Choi EK; Ahn HJ; Song HS; Lee YS; Oh S; Lip GYH
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e37970. PubMed ID: 35532989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dry textile electrode for ambulatory monitoring after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A pilot study of simultaneous comparison to the Holter electrocardiogram.
    Machino T; Aonuma K; Komatsu Y; Yamasaki H; Igarashi M; Nogami A; Ieda M
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():97. PubMed ID: 35860478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of a novel wearable electrode embedded in an undershirt for electrocardiogram monitoring and detection of arrhythmias.
    Amami K; Yoshihisa A; Horikoshi Y; Yamada S; Nehashi T; Hijioka N; Nodera M; Kaneshiro T; Yokokawa T; Misaka T; Takeishi Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273541. PubMed ID: 35998187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device.
    Choi W; Kim SH; Lee W; Kang SH; Yoon CH; Youn TJ; Chae IH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 35(44):e363. PubMed ID: 33200590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection.
    Karaoğuz MR; Yurtseven E; Aslan G; Deliormanlı BG; Adıgüzel Ö; Gönen M; Li KM; Yılmaz EN
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():28-35. PubMed ID: 30851474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic Mobile Health Arrhythmia Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Feasibility, Accuracy, and User Experience Study.
    Santala OE; Halonen J; Martikainen S; Jäntti H; Rissanen TT; Tarvainen MP; Laitinen TP; Laitinen TM; Väliaho ES; Hartikainen JEK; Martikainen TJ; Lipponen JA
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Oct; 9(10):e29933. PubMed ID: 34677135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in primary care using Holter monitoring and intermittent, ambulatory single-lead electrocardiography.
    Karregat EPM; Gurp NV; Bouwman AC; Uittenbogaart SB; Himmelreich JCL; Lucassen WAM; Krul SPJ; van Kesteren HAM; Luermans JGLM; van Weert HCPM; Stoffers HEJH
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 345():41-46. PubMed ID: 34687805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High Specificity Wearable Device With Photoplethysmography and Six-Lead Electrocardiography for Atrial Fibrillation Detection Challenged by Frequent Premature Contractions: DoubleCheck-AF.
    Bacevicius J; Abramikas Z; Dvinelis E; Audzijoniene D; Petrylaite M; Marinskiene J; Staigyte J; Karuzas A; Juknevicius V; Jakaite R; Basyte-Bacevice V; Bileisiene N; Solosenko A; Sokas D; Petrenas A; Butkuviene M; Paliakaite B; Daukantas S; Rapalis A; Marinskis G; Jasiunas E; Darma A; Marozas V; Aidietis A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():869730. PubMed ID: 35463751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Yield and consistency of arrhythmia detection with patch electrocardiographic monitoring: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
    Heckbert SR; Austin TR; Jensen PN; Floyd JS; Psaty BM; Soliman EZ; Kronmal RA
    J Electrocardiol; 2018; 51(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 30497763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the diagnostic value of a small, single channel, electrocardiogram monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours in dogs.
    Schreiber N; Willis R; Glaus T; Baron Toaldo M
    J Vet Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 47():47-54. PubMed ID: 37196397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.
    Cheung CC; Kerr CR; Krahn AD
    Future Cardiol; 2014 May; 10(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24976467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-lead electrocardiography compared to single-lead electrocardiography and photoplethysmography of a wrist-worn device for atrial fibrillation detection controlled by premature atrial or ventricular contractions: six is smarter than one.
    Bacevicius J; Taparauskaite N; Kundelis R; Sokas D; Butkuviene M; Stankeviciute G; Abramikas Z; Pilkiene A; Dvinelis E; Staigyte J; Marinskiene J; Audzijoniene D; Petrylaite M; Jukna E; Karuzas A; Juknevicius V; Jakaite R; Basyte-Bacevice V; Bileisiene N; Badaras I; Kiseliute M; Zarembaite G; Gudauskas M; Jasiunas E; Johnson L; Marozas V; Aidietis A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1160242. PubMed ID: 37363094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. At-home ECG monitoring with a real-time outpatient cardiac telemetry system during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Jaramillo N; Malkov D; Nikakis J; Arora US; Cohen TJ
    J Osteopath Med; 2022 Oct; 122(10):503-508. PubMed ID: 35946871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 72 hour Holter monitoring, 7 day Holter monitoring, and 30 day intermittent patient-activated heart rhythm recording in detecting arrhythmias in cryptogenic stroke patients free from arrhythmia in a screening 24 h Holter.
    Kułach A; Dewerenda M; Majewski M; Lasek-Bal A; Gąsior Z
    Open Med (Wars); 2020; 15(1):697-701. PubMed ID: 33336026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Necklace-embedded electrocardiogram for the detection and diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.
    Santala OE; Lipponen JA; Jäntti H; Rissanen TT; Halonen J; Kolk I; Pohjantähti-Maaroos H; Tarvainen MP; Väliaho ES; Hartikainen J; Martikainen T
    Clin Cardiol; 2021 May; 44(5):620-626. PubMed ID: 33629410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac Ambulatory Monitoring: New Wireless Device Validated Against Conventional Holter Monitoring in a Case Series.
    Murali S; Brugger N; Rincon F; Mashru M; Cook S; Goy JJ
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():587945. PubMed ID: 33330650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.
    Steinberg C; Philippon F; Sanchez M; Fortier-Poisson P; O'Hara G; Molin F; Sarrazin JF; Nault I; Blier L; Roy K; Plourde B; Champagne J
    Biosensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30669678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.