540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33947348)
1. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concordance of biopsy and pathologic ISUP grading in salvage radical prostatectomy patients for recurrent prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Würnschimmel C; Pose RM; Heinze A; Steuber T; Michl U; Salomon G; Mandel P; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 34807461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased Body Mass Index Is a Risk Factor for Poor Clinical Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Systematic Biopsies.
Ferro M; Terracciano D; Musi G; de Cobelli O; Vartolomei MD; Damiano R; Cantiello F; Buonerba C; Morelli M; Mistretta FA; Luzzago S; Perdonà S; Del Prete P; Del Giudice F; Busetto GM; Porreca A; Autorino R; Manfredi M; Porpiglia F; Muto M; Loizzo D; Ditonno P; Battaglia M; Lucarelli G
Urol Int; 2022; 106(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 34167120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.
Santok GD; Abdel Raheem A; Kim LH; Chang K; Lum TG; Chung BH; Choi YD; Rha KH
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Mar; 58(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 28261677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes in negative multiparametric MRI patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Wagaskar VG; Ratnani P; Levy M; Moody K; Garcia M; Pedraza AM; Parekh S; Pandav K; Shukla B; Sobotka S; Haines K; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Prostate; 2021 Aug; 81(11):772-777. PubMed ID: 34057211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.
Kesch C; Pantea V; Soeterik T; Marquis A; la Bombarda G; Morlacco A; Barletta F; Radtke JP; Darr C; Preisser F; Zattoni F; Marra G; van den Bergh RCN; Hadaschik B; Gandaglia G;
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 36534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.
Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Upgrading Rates of International Society of Urological Pathology Grades and Tumor Laterality in Patients Undergoing Standard 12-Core Prostate Biopsy versus Fusion Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer.
Demirtaş A; Sönmez G; Tombul ŞT; Demirtaş T; Akgün H
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 31242496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of prognostic group classification on prostate cancer progression in intermediate-risk patients according to the European Association of Urology system: results in 479 patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary referral center.
Porcaro AB; Bianchi A; Panunzio A; Gallina S; Tafuri A; Serafin E; Orlando R; Mazzucato G; Vidiri S; D'Aietti D; Montanaro F; Marafioti Patuzzo G; Artoni F; Baielli A; Ditonno F; Rizzetto R; Veccia A; Gozzo A; De Marco V; Brunelli M; Cerruto MA; Antonelli A
Ther Adv Urol; 2024; 16():17562872241229260. PubMed ID: 38348129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Risk factors of ISUP Modified Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy].
Li XD; Qu GY; Xu N; Xue XY; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Li JF; Cai H; Lin YZ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 May; 22(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 27416665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
