These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33947349)

  • 1. Women's expectations and experiences of labor induction - a questionnaire-based analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Strandberg M; Wallstrom T; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 33947349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
    Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's Experiences with and Preference for Induction of Labor with Oral Misoprostol or Foley Catheter at Term.
    Ten Eikelder ML; van de Meent MM; Mast K; Rengerink KO; Jozwiak M; de Graaf IM; Scholtenhuis MA; Roumen FJ; Porath MM; van Loon AJ; van den Akker ES; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Adriaanse AH; Muller MA; de Leeuw JW; Visser H; Woiski MD; Weerd SR; van Unnik GA; Pernet PJ; Versendaal H; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Jan; 34(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 27341122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
    Place K; Kruit H; Rahkonen L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Oct; 101(10):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35933726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
    Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Miller H; Parker L; Powers BL; Rayburn WF;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):533-541. PubMed ID: 21343755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases.
    Bräne E; Olsson A; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Oct; 93(10):1042-9. PubMed ID: 24974855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misoprostol vaginal insert and Foley catheter in labour induction - single center retrospective observational study of obstetrical outcome.
    Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Galuszewska J; Glijer K; Gluszek S
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):700-703. PubMed ID: 33301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Redling K; Schaedelin S; Huhn EA; Hoesli I
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 30179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard and adjusted criteria for the use of the misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):750-756. PubMed ID: 31373898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Jun; 48(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 32304314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.