These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33947550)
1. Biomechanical and Mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant for mandibular reconstruction: The effect of the topology optimization design. Peng WM; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Nizza M; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112056. PubMed ID: 33947550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite-element design and optimization of a three-dimensional tetrahedral porous titanium scaffold for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Luo D; Rong Q; Chen Q Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():176-183. PubMed ID: 28655500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanobiologically optimization of a 3D titanium-mesh implant for mandibular large defect: A simulated study. Gao H; Li X; Wang C; Ji P; Wang C Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Nov; 104():109934. PubMed ID: 31500061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Topological optimization of 3D printed bone analog with PEKK for surgical mandibular reconstruction. Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Zhang JX; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Xu X J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jul; 107():103758. PubMed ID: 32279058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant]. Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Design of a patient-specific mandible reconstruction implant with dental prosthesis for metal 3D printing using integrated weighted topology optimization and finite element analysis. Li CH; Wu CH; Lin CL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103700. PubMed ID: 32279847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: Implant design and finite element analysis. Pinheiro M; Alves JL J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2116-28. PubMed ID: 26596361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal placement of fixation system for scaffold-based mandibular reconstruction. Ferguson BM; Entezari A; Fang J; Li Q J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104855. PubMed ID: 34872868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure location prediction by finite element analysis for an additive manufactured mandible implant. Huo J; Dérand P; Rännar LE; Hirsch JM; Gamstedt EK Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):862-9. PubMed ID: 26227805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of alloplastic mandible reconstruction using biomaterials: The effect of implant design on stress concentration influences choice of material. Prasadh S; Suresh S; Hong KL; Bhargav A; Rosa V; Wong RCW J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103548. PubMed ID: 31783282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of customized implant in mandibular reconstruction after tumor resection with and without using customized surgical osteotomy guide. Dahake S; Kuthe A; Kulkarni S; Mawale M Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28868631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structural Design and Finite Element Simulation Analysis of Grade 3 Graded Porous Titanium Implant. Liu B; Xu W; Chen M; Chen D; Sun G; Zhang C; Pan Y; Lu J; Guo E; Lu X Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(17):. PubMed ID: 36077485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Preclinical Trial Protocol Using an Ovine Model to Assess Scaffold Implant Biomaterials for Repair of Critical-Sized Mandibular Defects. Xin H; Ferguson BM; Wan B; Al Maruf DSA; Lewin WT; Cheng K; Kruse HV; Leinkram D; Parthasarathi K; Wise IK; Froggatt C; Crook JM; McKenzie DR; Li Q; Clark JR ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 May; 10(5):2863-2879. PubMed ID: 38696332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of bite force and implant elastic modulus on mandibular reconstruction with particulate-cancellous bone marrow grafts healing: An in silico investigation. Sulaiman MY; Wicaksono S; Dirgantara T; Mahyuddin AI; Sadputranto SA; Oli'i EM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Sep; 157():106654. PubMed ID: 39042972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]