BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33947651)

  • 1. Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
    Caputo GG; Vigato E; Rampino Cordaro E; Parodi PC; Governa M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2573-2579. PubMed ID: 33947651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
    Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A controlled cost and outcomes analysis of acellular dermal matrix and implant-based reconstruction.
    Aliotta RE; Duraes EFR; Scomacao I; Morisada M; Orra S; Moreira A; Bernard S; Schwarz G; Djohan R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jun; 74(6):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 33526361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
    DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
    Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: Aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer.
    Brennan ME; Flitcroft K; Warrier S; Snook K; Spillane AJ
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():59-65. PubMed ID: 27611237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Comparative Outcome Study of One-Stage Direct-to-Implant and Two-Stage/Tissue Expander Techniques.
    Meshulam-Derazon S; Shay T; Lewis S; Adler N
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2018 Jun; 20(6):340-344. PubMed ID: 29911752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct-To-Implant and 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: Results of a Retrospective Comparison.
    Pallara T; Cagli B; Fortunato L; Altomare V; Loreti A; Grasso A; Manna E; Persichetti P
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 83(4):392-395. PubMed ID: 31524730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
    Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.
    Hanna KR; DeGeorge BR; Mericli AF; Lin KY; Drake DB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21862915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
    Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.
    Parabkaharan S; Melody M; Trotta R; Lleshi A; Sun W; Smith PD; Khakpour N; Dayicioglu D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S332-5. PubMed ID: 27187252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Salibian AH; Harness JK; Mowlds DS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28027223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Options in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Device Assembly.
    Sigalove S
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S. PubMed ID: 29166346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
    Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Aesthetics and Satisfaction in Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Implants and Fat Grafting.
    Qureshi AA; Odom EB; Parikh RP; Myckatyn TM; Tenenbaum MM
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Oct; 37(9):999-1008. PubMed ID: 28379284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Ganesh Kumar N; Berlin NL; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Wilkins EG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33172826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction: Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Two-Stages vs Single-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Zingaretti N; Piana M; Battellino L; Galvano F; De Francesco F; Riccio M; Beorchia Y; Castriotta L; Parodi PC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(9):1759-1772. PubMed ID: 37644192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.