These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 339477)
21. Reduction of mastitis caused by experimental challenge with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae by use of a quaternary ammonium and halogen-mixture teat dip. Boddie RL; Nickerson SC J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jan; 85(1):258-62. PubMed ID: 11860119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of two iodophor teat germicides: activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. Boddie RL; Nickerson SC J Dairy Sci; 1997 Aug; 80(8):1846-50. PubMed ID: 9276825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficacy of .18% iodine teat dip against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae. Boddie RL; Nickerson SC J Dairy Sci; 1989 Apr; 72(4):1063-6. PubMed ID: 2663939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Iodine concentrations in milk from iodophor teat dips. Berg JN; Padgitt D J Dairy Sci; 1985 Feb; 68(2):457-61. PubMed ID: 3989086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy of a barrier teat dip containing .55% chlorhexidine for prevention of bovine mastitis. Hogan JS; Smith KL; Todhunter DA; Schoenberger PS J Dairy Sci; 1995 Nov; 78(11):2502-6. PubMed ID: 8747340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy evaluation of two new teat dip formulations under experimental challenge. Pankey JW; Boddie RL; Nickerson SC J Dairy Sci; 1985 Feb; 68(2):462-5. PubMed ID: 3886732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of a 1.94% sulfonic acid teat dip and a 1% iodophor teat dip on teat canal infections in lactating dairy cows. Watts JL; Nickerson SC; Boddie RL; Ray CH J Dairy Sci; 1991 Mar; 74(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 2071709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of premilking udder preparation on bacterial population, sediment, and iodine residue in milk. Galton DM; Petersson LG; Merrill WG; Bandler DK; Shuster DE J Dairy Sci; 1984 Nov; 67(11):2580-9. PubMed ID: 6520268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of the antibacterial action of five udder washes. Davies ME; O'Neill JC Vet Rec; 1980 Sep; 107(12):277-80. PubMed ID: 7010765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The comparative effect of chlorhexidine and cetrimonium bromide on erythrocyte membranes. Jensen JE Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1976 May; 38(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 989249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Germicidal activities of representatives of five different teat dip classes against three bovine mycoplasma species using a modified excised teat model. Boddie RL; Owens WE; Ray CH; Nickerson SC; Boddie NT J Dairy Sci; 2002 Aug; 85(8):1909-12. PubMed ID: 12214982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a postmilking teat disinfectant for the prevention of bovine mastitis during lactation. Oliver SP; King SH; Lewis MJ; Torre PM; Matthews KR; Dowlen HH J Dairy Sci; 1990 Aug; 73(8):2230-5. PubMed ID: 2229606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of powdered 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate-based postmilking teat dip compared with a foamed 1% iodine-based postmilking teat dip under cold weather conditions in northern New York. Morrill KM; Scillieri Smith JC; Dann HM; Gauthier HM; Ballard CS J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2507-2514. PubMed ID: 30612797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The clinical effectiveness of a post milking teat disinfection method with a foaming iodophor teat dip]. Falkenberg U; Tenhagen BA; Heuwieser W; Kalbe P; Klünder G; Baumgärtner B Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 Feb; 110(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 12666500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of a disinfectant udder wash and a post-milking teat dip on the bacterial population of the teat end and on the rate of new intramammary infection. Sheldrake RF; Hoare RJ J Dairy Res; 1980 Oct; 47(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 7451707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Study of combinations of antimicrobial agents. Development of the method]. Martin H; Maris P Ann Pharm Fr; 1993; 51(4):175-85. PubMed ID: 8154787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Antimicrobial efficacy of biocides tested on skin using an ex-vivo test. Maillard JY; Messager S; Veillon R J Hosp Infect; 1998 Dec; 40(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 9868624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]