BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33948701)

  • 1. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time.
    Park EK; Kwak S; Lee W; Choi JS; Kooi T; Kim EK
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230318. PubMed ID: 38568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3958-3966. PubMed ID: 37975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
    Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
    Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yoon JH; Strand F; Baltzer PAT; Conant EF; Gilbert FJ; Lehman CD; Morris EA; Mullen LA; Nishikawa RM; Sharma N; Vejborg I; Moy L; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e222639. PubMed ID: 37219445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
    Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
    Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Take a break: should breaks be enforced during digital breast tomosynthesis reading sessions?
    Partridge GJW; Taib AG; Phillips P; James JJ; Satchithananda K; Sharma N; Morel J; McAvinchey R; Valencia A; Teh W; Khan H; Muscat E; Michell MJ; Chen Y
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1388-1398. PubMed ID: 37589906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection.
    Trieu PDY; Noakes J; Li T; Borecky N; Brennan PC; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220704. PubMed ID: 36802348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
    Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Preliminary Real-world Experience.
    Letter H; Peratikos M; Toledano A; Hoffmeister J; Nishikawa R; Conant E; Shisler J; Maimone S; Diaz de Villegas H
    J Breast Imaging; 2023 May; 5(3):258-266. PubMed ID: 38416890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.
    Nguyen DL; Ren Y; Jones TM; Thomas SM; Lo JY; Grimm LJ
    Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e232286. PubMed ID: 38771177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.
    Hossain MB; Nishikawa RM; Lee J
    Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608. PubMed ID: 35916103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of an artificial intelligence software in clinical senology: a mammography multi-reader study.
    Bassi E; Russo A; Oliboni E; Zamboni F; De Santis C; Mansueto G; Montemezzi S; Foti G
    Radiol Med; 2024 Feb; 129(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 38082194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
    Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial Intelligence in Breast X-Ray Imaging.
    Vedantham S; Shazeeb MS; Chiang A; Vijayaraghavan GR
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2023 Feb; 44(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 36792270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.