These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33948752)

  • 1. Initial forest age distribution may generate computational sinks or sources of carbon: A generic approach to test assumptions underlying the EU LULUCF forest reference levels.
    Vauhkonen J; Mutanen A; Packalen T; Asikainen A
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 May; 16(1):13. PubMed ID: 33948752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding the implications of the EU-LULUCF regulation for the wood supply from EU forests to the EU.
    Nabuurs GJ; Arets EJMM; Schelhaas MJ
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Oct; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 30328011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of modelling choices on setting the reference levels for the EU forest carbon sinks: how do different assumptions affect the country-specific forest reference levels?
    Forsell N; Korosuo A; Gusti M; Rüter S; Havlik P; Obersteiner M
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2019 Sep; 14(1):10. PubMed ID: 31482440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting the forest reference levels in the European Union: overview and challenges.
    Vizzarri M; Pilli R; Korosuo A; Blujdea VNB; Rossi S; Fiorese G; Abad-Viñas R; Colditz RR; Grassi G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 Jul; 16(1):23. PubMed ID: 34331610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation in managed forests.
    Grassi G; Pilli R; House J; Federici S; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 May; 13(1):8. PubMed ID: 29774443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. II. EU-level analysis.
    Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Moris JV; Viñas RA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 27635153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products.
    Pilli R; Fiorese G; Grassi G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10(1):6. PubMed ID: 26457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) modeling system for projecting localized forest CO
    Latta GS; Baker JS; Ohrel S
    For Policy Econ; 2017 Nov; 87():35-48. PubMed ID: 32280299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrate carbon dynamic models in analyzing carbon sequestration impact of forest biomass harvest.
    Yan Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 615():581-587. PubMed ID: 28988094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the INDCs' land use, land use change, and forest emission projections.
    Forsell N; Turkovska O; Gusti M; Obersteiner M; Elzen MD; Havlik P
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 28018480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting of GHG emissions and removals from forest management: a long road from Kyoto to Paris.
    Krug JHA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Jan; 13(1):1. PubMed ID: 29330699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector.
    Dugan AJ; Birdsey R; Mascorro VS; Magnan M; Smyth CE; Olguin M; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 30182168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions.
    Smyth CE; Smiley BP; Magnan M; Birdsey R; Dugan AJ; Olguin M; Mascorro VS; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 30187146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. I. Comparison with countries' estimates for forest management.
    Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Viñas RA; Guerrero NH
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):5. PubMed ID: 27340427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delineating managed land for reporting national greenhouse gas emissions and removals to the United Nations framework convention on climate change.
    Ogle SM; Domke G; Kurz WA; Rocha MT; Huffman T; Swan A; Smith JE; Woodall C; Krug T
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 May; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 29845384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Actual European forest management by region, tree species and owner based on 714,000 re-measured trees in national forest inventories.
    Schelhaas MJ; Fridman J; Hengeveld GM; Henttonen HM; Lehtonen A; Kies U; Krajnc N; Lerink B; Ní Dhubháin Á; Polley H; Pugh TAM; Redmond JJ; Rohner B; Temperli C; Vayreda J; Nabuurs GJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207151. PubMed ID: 30418996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
    Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental impacts of various biomass supply chains for the provision of raw wood in Bavaria, Germany, with focus on climate change.
    Klein D; Wolf C; Schulz C; Weber-Blaschke G
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():45-60. PubMed ID: 26352646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Under What Circumstances Do Wood Products from Native Forests Benefit Climate Change Mitigation?
    Keith H; Lindenmayer D; Macintosh A; Mackey B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139640. PubMed ID: 26436916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative emissions from stopping deforestation and forest degradation, globally.
    Houghton RA; Nassikas AA
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jan; 24(1):350-359. PubMed ID: 28833909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.