These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33949919)

  • 1. Moving beyond recycling: Examining steps for local government to integrate sustainable materials management.
    Anshassi M; Preuss B; Townsend TG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Aug; 71(8):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 33949919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replacing Recycling Rates with Life-Cycle Metrics as Government Materials Management Targets.
    Anshassi M; Laux S; Townsend TG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jun; 52(11):6544-6554. PubMed ID: 29750863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production.
    Fyffe JR; Breckel AC; Townsend AK; Webber ME
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):276-84. PubMed ID: 26187294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England.
    Wang D; Tang YT; Long G; Higgitt D; He J; Robinson D
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():452-463. PubMed ID: 31739279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Areas on which to focus when seeking to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of commercial waste management. A case study of a hypermarket, Finland.
    Hupponen M; Grönman K; Horttanainen M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():1-18. PubMed ID: 29576513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building.
    Vitale P; Arena N; Di Gregorio F; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():311-321. PubMed ID: 27742229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is selective demolition always a sustainable choice?
    Pantini S; Rigamonti L
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 103():169-176. PubMed ID: 31887689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A BIM-based system for demolition and renovation waste estimation and planning.
    Cheng JC; Ma LY
    Waste Manag; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1539-51. PubMed ID: 23490358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost compensation model for construction and demolition waste disposal in South China.
    Liu J; Teng Y; Jiang Y; Gong E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(14):13773-13784. PubMed ID: 30128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis.
    Roussat N; Dujet C; Méhu J
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jan; 29(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18572397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward zero waste: composting and recycling for sustainable venue based events.
    Hottle TA; Bilec MM; Brown NR; Landis AE
    Waste Manag; 2015 Apr; 38():86-94. PubMed ID: 25666546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A bi-level environmental impact assessment framework for comparing construction and demolition waste management strategies.
    Yazdanbakhsh A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():401-412. PubMed ID: 29709308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An environmental assessment model of construction and demolition waste based on system dynamics: a case study in Guangzhou.
    Liu J; Liu Y; Wang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):37237-37259. PubMed ID: 31893359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.
    Islam R; Nazifa TH; Yuniarto A; Shanawaz Uddin ASM; Salmiati S; Shahid S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():10-21. PubMed ID: 31351595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of critical factors in construction and demolition waste recycling by the grey-DEMATEL approach: a Chinese perspective.
    Liu H; Long H; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):8507-8525. PubMed ID: 31907809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of scenarios for the integrated management of construction and demolition waste by life cycle assessment: A case study in Brazil.
    Penteado CS; Rosado LP
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1026-1035. PubMed ID: 27443296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of municipal solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in Malaysia and the way forward.
    Michel Devadoss PS; Agamuthu P; Mehran SB; Santha C; Fauziah SH
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jan; 119():135-144. PubMed ID: 33059163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System dynamic analysis of construction waste recycling industry chain in China.
    Liu J; Teng Y; Wang D; Gong E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(30):37260-37277. PubMed ID: 31893357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.