These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33950295)

  • 1. Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload.
    Graessler MF; Wodack KH; Pinnschmidt HO; Nishimoto S; Behem CR; Reuter DA; Trepte CJC
    J Anesth; 2021 Aug; 35(4):488-494. PubMed ID: 33950295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulmonary hypertension attenuates the dynamic preload indicators increase during experimental hypovolemia.
    Bouchacourt JP; Riva J; Grignola JC
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):35. PubMed ID: 28253850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collapsibility of caval vessels and right ventricular afterload: decoupling of stroke volume variation from preload during mechanical ventilation.
    Valenti E; Moller PW; Takala J; Berger D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2021 May; 130(5):1562-1572. PubMed ID: 33734829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thermodilution-derived indices for assessment of left and right ventricular cardiac function in normal and impaired cardiac function.
    Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Richter HP; Goepfert MS; Kubitz JC; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Sep; 39(9):2106-12. PubMed ID: 21572331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload.
    Trepte CJ; Haas SA; Nitzschke R; Salzwedel C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23972740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: an interventional study in coronary artery bypass surgery patients.
    Flick M; Sand U; Bergholz A; Kouz K; Reiter B; Flotzinger D; Saugel B; Kubitz JC
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Dec; 36(6):1817-1825. PubMed ID: 35233702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a positive end-expiratory pressure-induced reduction in stroke volume indicate preload responsiveness? An experimental study.
    Lambert P; Sloth E; Smith B; Hansen LK; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Tønnesen E; Larsson A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 17378779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
    Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review.
    Gan H; Cannesson M; Chandler JR; Ansermino JM
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Dec; 117(6):1380-92. PubMed ID: 24257389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulse pressure variation is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure.
    Shim JK; Song JW; Song Y; Kim JH; Kang HM; Kwak YL
    J Crit Care; 2014 Dec; 29(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 25216949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic and volumetric variables of fluid responsiveness fail during immediate postresuscitation period.
    Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Koerner S; Renner J; Maracke M; Schrezenmeir J; Steinfath M; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2011 Aug; 39(8):1953-9. PubMed ID: 21532471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock.
    Nouira S; Elatrous S; Dimassi S; Besbes L; Boukef R; Mohamed B; Abroug F
    Crit Care Med; 2005 Oct; 33(10):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16215390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Preload on Right Ventricular Hemodynamics in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.
    Mortensen CS; Kramer A; Schultz J; Lyhne MD; Nielsen-Kudsk JE; Andersen A
    Crit Care Med; 2020 Dec; 48(12):e1306-e1312. PubMed ID: 33060507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of right ventricular insufficiency and guidance of volume therapy are facilitated by simultaneous monitoring of static and functional preload parameters.
    Richter HP; Petersen C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA; Kubitz JC
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1051-5. PubMed ID: 21924635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
    Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global end-diastolic volume as a variable of fluid responsiveness during acute changing loading conditions.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Brand P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Lutter G; Bein B
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 17905268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload.
    Lichtwarck-Aschoff M; Beale R; Pfeiffer UJ
    J Crit Care; 1996 Dec; 11(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 8977994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow.
    Behem CR; Graessler MF; Friedheim T; Kluttig R; Pinnschmidt HO; Duprée A; Debus ES; Reuter DA; Wipper SH; Trepte CJC
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9215. PubMed ID: 33911116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.