280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33950487)
21. Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.
Stewart PA; Fang B; Slebos RJ; Zhang G; Borne AL; Fellows K; Teer JK; Chen YA; Welsh E; Eschrich SA; Haura EB; Koomen JM
Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28195392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peptide Labeling Using Isobaric Tagging Reagents for Quantitative Phosphoproteomics.
Cheng L; Pisitkun T; Knepper MA; Hoffert JD
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():53-70. PubMed ID: 26584918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating Acquisition Performance on the Orbitrap Fusion When Using Tandem MS/MS/MS Scanning with Isobaric Tags.
Hughes CS; Spicer V; Krokhin OV; Morin GB
J Proteome Res; 2017 May; 16(5):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 28418257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. iTRAQ-Based Shotgun Proteomics Approach for Relative Protein Quantification.
Núñez EV; Domont GB; Nogueira FCS
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1546():267-274. PubMed ID: 27896776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Determination of Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome Variations by Isobaric Labeling Coupled with Strong Cation-Exchange Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Lachén-Montes M; González-Morales A; Fernández-Irigoyen J; Santamaría E
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2044():155-168. PubMed ID: 31432412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of Higher-Energy Collisional Dissociation Fragmentation Energy for Intact Protein-Level Tandem Mass Tag Labeling.
Guo Y; Chowdhury T; Seshadri M; Cupp-Sutton KA; Wang Q; Yu D; Wu S
J Proteome Res; 2023 May; 22(5):1406-1418. PubMed ID: 36603205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Isobaric Labeling-Based LC-MS/MS Strategy for Comprehensive Profiling of Human Pancreatic Tissue Proteome.
Liu CW; Zhang Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():215-224. PubMed ID: 28986817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluating the Characteristics of Reporter Ion Signal Acquired in the Orbitrap Analyzer for Isobaric Mass Tag Proteome Quantification Experiments.
Hughes CS; Zhu C; Spicer V; Krokhin OV; Morin GB
J Proteome Res; 2017 May; 16(5):1831-1838. PubMed ID: 28418254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative proteome analysis using isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL).
Arntzen MO; Koehler CJ; Treumann A; Thiede B
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():65-76. PubMed ID: 21604116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proteomic Profiling of Cerebrospinal Fluid by 16-Plex TMT-Based Mass Spectrometry.
Dey KK; Sun H; Wang Z; Niu M; Wang H; Jiao Y; Sun X; Li Y; Peng J
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2420():21-37. PubMed ID: 34905163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Two Birds with One Stone: Parallel Quantification of Proteome and Phosphoproteome Using iTRAQ.
Solari FA; Kollipara L; Sickmann A; Zahedi RP
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1394():25-41. PubMed ID: 26700039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. SIMSI-Transfer: Software-Assisted Reduction of Missing Values in Phosphoproteomic and Proteomic Isobaric Labeling Data Using Tandem Mass Spectrum Clustering.
Hamood F; Bayer FP; Wilhelm M; Kuster B; The M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2022 Aug; 21(8):100238. PubMed ID: 35462064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification.
High AA; Tan H; Pagala VR; Niu M; Cho JH; Wang X; Bai B; Peng J
J Vis Exp; 2017 Nov; (129):. PubMed ID: 29286450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative Top-Down Proteomics in Complex Samples Using Protein-Level Tandem Mass Tag Labeling.
Yu D; Wang Z; Cupp-Sutton KA; Guo Y; Kou Q; Smith K; Liu X; Wu S
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 33725447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiplexed Protease Specificity Profiling Using Isobaric Labeling.
Tucher J; Tholey A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1574():171-182. PubMed ID: 28315250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative evaluation of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Chen Z; Wang Q; Lin L; Tang Q; Edwards JL; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2908-15. PubMed ID: 22404494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative Evaluation of Proteome Discoverer and FragPipe for the TMT-Based Proteome Quantification.
He T; Liu Y; Zhou Y; Li L; Wang H; Chen S; Gao J; Jiang W; Yu Y; Ge W; Chang HY; Fan Z; Nesvizhskii AI; Guo T; Sun Y
J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):3007-3015. PubMed ID: 36315902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. TMTpro reagents: a set of isobaric labeling mass tags enables simultaneous proteome-wide measurements across 16 samples.
Li J; Van Vranken JG; Pontano Vaites L; Schweppe DK; Huttlin EL; Etienne C; Nandhikonda P; Viner R; Robitaille AM; Thompson AH; Kuhn K; Pike I; Bomgarden RD; Rogers JC; Gygi SP; Paulo JA
Nat Methods; 2020 Apr; 17(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 32203386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics for High-Throughput Comprehensive Proteome Comparisons of Human Cell Lines.
Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1394():1-13. PubMed ID: 26700037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
