These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33950865)

  • 21. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
    Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.
    Johns MA; Calloway RC; Karunathilake IMD; Decruy LP; Anderson S; Simon JZ; Kuchinsky SE
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241245240. PubMed ID: 38613337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Benefit of Hearing Aids as Measured by Listening Accuracy, Subjective Listening Effort, and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Vaisberg JM; Gilmore S; Qian J; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241273346. PubMed ID: 39195628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Toward a Listening Training Paradigm: Evaluation in Normal-Hearing Young and Middle-Aged Adults.
    Van Wilderode M; Van Humbeeck N; Krampe RT; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 37076940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listening Effort and Speech Perception Performance Using Different Facemasks.
    Mendel LL; Pousson MA; Shukla B; Sander K; Larson B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4354-4368. PubMed ID: 36215671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Breathy Vocal Quality on Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in Background Noise.
    Shen J; Heller Murray E; Kulick ER
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231206925. PubMed ID: 37817666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.
    Alhanbali S; Dawes P; Millman RE; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1084-1097. PubMed ID: 30747742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech to noise ratio improvement induces nonlinear parietal phase synchrony in hearing aid users.
    Shahsavari Baboukani P; Graversen C; Alickovic E; Østergaard J
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():932959. PubMed ID: 36017182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
    Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring the Impact of Tinnitus on Aided Listening Effort Using Pupillary Response.
    Juul Jensen J; Callaway SL; Lunner T; Wendt D
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518795340. PubMed ID: 30205768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contributions of listening effort and intelligibility to cortical tracking of speech in adverse listening conditions.
    Ershaid H; Lizarazu M; McLaughlin D; Cooke M; Simantiraki O; Koutsogiannaki M; Lallier M
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():54-71. PubMed ID: 38215511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Previous Mental Load and Incentives Influence Anticipatory Arousal as Indexed by the Baseline Pupil Diameter in a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Alfandari D; Richter M; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Naylor G
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231196520. PubMed ID: 37847850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function.
    McMahon CM; Boisvert I; de Lissa P; Granger L; Ibrahim R; Lo CY; Miles K; Graham PL
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():745. PubMed ID: 27252671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using the Repeat-Recall Test to Examine Factors Affecting Context Use.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):771-780. PubMed ID: 33588513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
    Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.
    Reinten I; De Ronde-Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014437. PubMed ID: 34027725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.