These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33951188)

  • 1. Can pupillometry distinguish accurate from inaccurate familiarity?
    Gomes CA; Montaldi D; Mayes A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13825. PubMed ID: 33951188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pupillary response discriminates between subjective and objective familiarity and novelty.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Oct; 52(10):1305-16. PubMed ID: 26174940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saying "yes" when you want to say "no" - pupil dilation reflects evidence accumulation in a visual working memory recognition task.
    Lewandowska K; Gągol A; Sikora-Wachowicz B; Marek T; Fąfrowicz M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 May; 139():18-32. PubMed ID: 30851281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is Pupil Activity Associated With the Strength of Memory Signal for Words in a Continuous Recognition Memory Paradigm?
    Oliveira J; Fernandes M; Rosa PJ; Gamito P
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():686183. PubMed ID: 34887795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pupil as an indicator of unconscious memory: Introducing the pupil priming effect.
    Gomes CA; Montaldi D; Mayes A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jun; 52(6):754-69. PubMed ID: 25656874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory.
    Woollams AM; Taylor JR; Karayanidis F; Henson RN
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1114-29. PubMed ID: 18211248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Pupillary Response to the Unknown: Novelty Versus Familiarity.
    Beukema S; Jennings BJ; Olson JA; Kingdom FAA
    Iperception; 2019; 10(5):2041669519874817. PubMed ID: 31523417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related changes in neural activity associated with familiarity, recollection and false recognition.
    Duarte A; Graham KS; Henson RN
    Neurobiol Aging; 2010 Oct; 31(10):1814-30. PubMed ID: 19004526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual pupil size changes as a robust indicator of cognitive familiarity differences.
    Franzen L; Cabugao A; Grohmann B; Elalouf K; Johnson AP
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262753. PubMed ID: 35061832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry.
    Papesh MH; Goldinger SD; Hout MC
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 22019480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-related factors in pupil old/new effects: Attention, response execution, and false memory.
    Brocher A; Graf T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():124-134. PubMed ID: 28624522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Picture-evoked changes in pupil size predict learning success in children.
    Wetzel N; Einhäuser W; Widmann A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Apr; 192():104787. PubMed ID: 31981750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupil size tracks cue-trace interactions during episodic memory retrieval.
    Siefert EM; He M; Festa EK; Heindel WC
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jan; 61(1):e14409. PubMed ID: 37571917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The eye of the retriever: developing episodic memory mechanisms in preverbal infants assessed through pupil dilation.
    Hellmer K; Söderlund H; Gredebäck G
    Dev Sci; 2018 Mar; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 27981704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting feigned cognitive impairment using pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words.
    Patrick SD; Rapport LJ; Hanks RA; Kanser RJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 38402625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect.
    Võ ML; Jacobs AM; Kuchinke L; Hofmann M; Conrad M; Schacht A; Hutzler F
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 17910733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological correlates associated with contributions of perceptual and conceptual fluency to familiarity.
    Wang W; Li B; Gao C; Xiao X; Guo C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():321. PubMed ID: 26097450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.