BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3395207)

  • 1. Limitations on psychiatrists' discretionary civil commitment authority by the Stone and dangerousness criteria.
    Hoge SK; Sachs G; Appelbaum PS; Greer A; Gordon C
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):764-9. PubMed ID: 3395207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
    Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stone-Roth model of civil commitment and the California dangerousness standard: operational comparison.
    Monahan J; Ruggiero M; Friedlander HD
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 39(11):1267-71. PubMed ID: 7138227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Civil commitment. The relationship between perceived dangerousness and mental illness.
    Mills MJ
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):770-2. PubMed ID: 3395208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. II. Mental disorder indicators and three dangerousness criteria.
    Segal SP; Watson MA; Goldfinger SM; Averbuck DS
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):753-8. PubMed ID: 3395205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. I. The assessment of dangerousness by emergency room clinicians.
    Segal SP; Watson MA; Goldfinger SM; Averbuck DS
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 3395204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. III. Disposition as a function of mental disorder and dangerousness indicators.
    Segal SP; Watson MA; Goldfinger SM; Averbuck DS
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 45(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 3395206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.
    Lidz CW; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Cleveland S
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 2912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive validity of judgments of dangerousness in emergency civil commitment.
    McNiel DE; Binder RL
    Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Feb; 144(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 3812787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term civil commitment and the violent patient.
    Yesavage JA; Werner PD; Becker JM; Mills MJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Sep; 139(9):1145-9. PubMed ID: 7114307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical judgments in the decision to commit. Psychiatric discretion and the law.
    Schwartz HI; Appelbaum PS; Kaplan RD
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1984 Aug; 41(8):811-5. PubMed ID: 6742980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Need-for-treatment criteria for involuntary civil commitment: impact in practice.
    Miller RD
    Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Oct; 149(10):1380-4. PubMed ID: 1341418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision to seek commitment. Psychiatric decision making in a legal context.
    Appelbaum PS; Hamm RM
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1982 Apr; 39(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 7065852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. North Carolina resident psychiatrists knowledge of the commitment statutes: do they stray from the legal standard in the hypothetical application of involuntary commitment criteria?
    Kaufman AR; Way B
    Psychiatr Q; 2010 Dec; 81(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 20628901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender and the assessment of dangerousness in the psychiatric emergency room.
    Coontz PD; Lidz CW; Mulvey EP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 7890471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do dangerousness-oriented commitment laws restrict hospitalization of patients who need treatment? A test.
    Cleveland S; Mulvey EP; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1989 Mar; 40(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 2917736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The paradoxical impact of a commitment statute on prediction of dangerousness.
    Beigel A; Berren MR; Harding TW
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Mar; 141(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 6703101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntary confinement: legal and psychiatric perspectives.
    Dresser R
    J Med Philos; 1984 Aug; 9(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 6491556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.
    Rachlin S
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Aug; 38(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 3610091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.