These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3395207)
21. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment. Treffert DA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The dangerousness criterion for civil commitment: the problem and a possible solution. Brouillette MJ; Paris J Can J Psychiatry; 1991 May; 36(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 1868422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Suicide and civil commitment. Siegel K; Tuckel P J Health Polit Policy Law; 1987; 12(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 3611678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Decision making in psychiatric civil commitment: an experimental analysis. Bagby RM; Thompson JS; Dickens SE; Nohara M Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1984703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The dangerousness criterion for civil commitment. Rapp MS Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Jun; 36(5):388. PubMed ID: 1884343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts. Large MM; Ryan CJ; Nielssen OB; Hayes RA J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 19043114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of statutory revisions to family-petitioned civil commitment in South Korea. Oh H; Cho Y; Bae J; Holley LC; Shafer M; Kim K; Lee Y Int J Law Psychiatry; 2024; 94():101982. PubMed ID: 38603975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Innovative statutory approaches to civil commitment: an overview and critique. Shuman DW Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):284-9. PubMed ID: 3915334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings. Bursztajn HJ; Hamm RM; Gutheil TG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 9148885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Process analysis of judges' commitment decisions: a preliminary empirical study. Bursztajn H; Gutheil TG; Mills M; Hamm RM; Brodsky A Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Feb; 143(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 3946649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dangerousness and commitment of the mentally disordered in the United States. Monahan J; Shah SA Schizophr Bull; 1989; 15(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 2696085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Decision makers in law and psychiatry and the involuntary civil commitment process. Lipsitt PD; Lelos D Community Ment Health J; 1981; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 7347628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How Alberta psychiatrists view commitment criteria and the problem of predicting dangerousness. Arboleda-Florez J; Holly H Can J Psychiatry; 1984 Feb; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 6704884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dangerousness and disability as predictors of psychiatric patients' legal status. Pokorny L; Shull RD; Nicholson RA Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(3):253-67. PubMed ID: 10481128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill as a moral issue. Chodoff P Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Mar; 141(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 6703103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An empirical study of emergency commitment. Faulkner LR; McFarland BH; Bloom JD Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2912260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can the police assist in detaining persons for involuntary commitment? Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Jan; 48(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9117493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]