These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

876 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33954258)

  • 1. A manifesto for reproducible science.
    Munafò MR; Nosek BA; Bishop DVM; Button KS; Chambers CD; du Sert NP; Simonsohn U; Wagenmakers EJ; Ware JJ; Ioannidis JPA
    Nat Hum Behav; 2017 Jan; 1(1):0021. PubMed ID: 33954258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.
    Grant S; Wendt KE; Leadbeater BJ; Supplee LH; Mayo-Wilson E; Gardner F; Bradshaw CP
    Prev Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(5):701-722. PubMed ID: 35175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing Institutional Scores With the Rigor and Transparency Index: Large-scale Analysis of Scientific Reporting Quality.
    Menke J; Eckmann P; Ozyurt IB; Roelandse M; Anderson N; Grethe J; Gamst A; Bandrowski A
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jun; 24(6):e37324. PubMed ID: 35759334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An open science peer review oath.
    Aleksic J; Alexa A; Attwood TK; Chue Hong N; Dahlö M; Davey R; Dinkel H; Förstner KU; Grigorov I; Hériché JK; Lahti L; MacLean D; Markie ML; Molloy J; Schneider MV; Scott C; Smith-Unna R; Vieira BM;
    F1000Res; 2014; 3():271. PubMed ID: 25653839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital open science-Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research.
    Toelch U; Ostwald D
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Jul; 16(7):e2006022. PubMed ID: 30048447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science.
    Ram K
    Source Code Biol Med; 2013 Feb; 8(1):7. PubMed ID: 23448176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis.
    Catalá-López F; Caulley L; Ridao M; Hutton B; Husereau D; Drummond MF; Alonso-Arroyo A; Pardo-Fernández M; Bernal-Delgado E; Meneu R; Tabarés-Seisdedos R; Repullo JR; Moher D
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e034463. PubMed ID: 32060160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals.
    Spitschan M; Schmidt MH; Blume C
    Wellcome Open Res; 2020; 5():172. PubMed ID: 33748432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Evaluation of Nephrology Literature for Transparency and Reproducibility Indicators: Cross-Sectional Review.
    Fladie IA; Adewumi TM; Vo NH; Tritz DJ; Vassar MB
    Kidney Int Rep; 2020 Feb; 5(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32043031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017).
    Hardwicke TE; Wallach JD; Kidwell MC; Bendixen T; Crüwell S; Ioannidis JPA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Feb; 7(2):190806. PubMed ID: 32257301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies.
    White J; Tannenbaum C; Klinge I; Schiebinger L; Clayton J
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Sep; 106(10):3034-3048. PubMed ID: 34137862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices.
    Mayo-Wilson E; Grant S; Supplee L; Kianersi S; Amin A; DeHaven A; Mellor D
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(1):9. PubMed ID: 34078479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research.
    McIntosh LD; Juehne A; Vitale CRH; Liu X; Alcoser R; Lukas JC; Evanoff B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28923006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement.
    Stewart AJ; Farran EK; Grange JA; Macleod M; Munafò M; Newton P; Shanks DR;
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Dec; 14(1):458. PubMed ID: 34930427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moving Toward Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable Practices in Epidemiologic Research.
    García-Closas M; Ahearn TU; Gaudet MM; Hurson AN; Balasubramanian JB; Choudhury PP; Gerlanc NM; Patel B; Russ D; Abubakar M; Freedman ND; Wong WSW; Chanock SJ; Berrington de Gonzalez A; Almeida JS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 192(6):995-1005. PubMed ID: 36804665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility.
    Hrynaszkiewicz I
    Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():319-348. PubMed ID: 31691858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Manifesto for exercise science - a vision for improving the health of the public and planet.
    Smith A; Broom D; Murphy M; Biddle S
    J Sports Sci; 2022 May; 40(10):1110-1115. PubMed ID: 35262464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.