These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33954986)

  • 1. Density-dependent private benefit leads to bacterial mutualism.
    Jimenez P; Scheuring I
    Evolution; 2021 Jul; 75(7):1619-1635. PubMed ID: 33954986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How spatial structure and neighbor uncertainty promote mutualists and weaken black queen effects.
    Stump SM; Johnson EC; Sun Z; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 446():33-60. PubMed ID: 29499252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased privatization of a public resource leads to spread of cooperation in a microbial population.
    Raj N; Saini S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):e0235823. PubMed ID: 38206031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trading public goods stabilizes interspecific mutualism.
    Archetti M; Scheuring I
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Feb; 318():58-67. PubMed ID: 23103772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of bidirectional costly mutualism from byproduct consumption.
    Harcombe WR; Chacón JM; Adamowicz EM; Chubiz LM; Marx CJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Nov; 115(47):12000-12004. PubMed ID: 30348787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Siderophore-mediated iron partition promotes dynamical coexistence between cooperators and cheaters.
    Shao J; Rong N; Wu Z; Gu S; Liu B; Shen N; Li Z
    iScience; 2023 Sep; 26(9):107396. PubMed ID: 37701813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction effects of cell diffusion, cell density and public goods properties on the evolution of cooperation in digital microbes.
    Dobay A; Bagheri HC; Messina A; Kümmerli R; Rankin DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1869-77. PubMed ID: 24962623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintenance of Microbial Cooperation Mediated by Public Goods in Single- and Multiple-Trait Scenarios.
    Özkaya Ö; Xavier KB; Dionisio F; Balbontín R
    J Bacteriol; 2017 Nov; 199(22):. PubMed ID: 28847922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-local interaction via diffusible resource prevents coexistence of cooperators and cheaters in a lattice model.
    Borenstein DB; Meir Y; Shaevitz JW; Wingreen NS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63304. PubMed ID: 23691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial self-organization favors heterotypic cooperation over cheating.
    Momeni B; Waite AJ; Shou W
    Elife; 2013 Nov; 2():e00960. PubMed ID: 24220506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusive public goods and coexistence of cooperators and cheaters on a 1D lattice.
    Scheuring I
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100769. PubMed ID: 25025985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a strategy for cooperating cells to survive the presence of cheaters.
    Prajapat MK; Shroff I; Brajesh RG; Saini S
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Oct; 12(11):3338-3346. PubMed ID: 27754502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation to a new environment allows cooperators to purge cheaters stochastically.
    Waite AJ; Shou W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(47):19079-86. PubMed ID: 23091010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbial cross-feeding promotes multiple stable states and species coexistence, but also susceptibility to cheaters.
    Sun Z; Koffel T; Stump SM; Grimaud GM; Klausmeier CA
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 465():63-77. PubMed ID: 30639296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How public can public goods be? Environmental context shapes the evolutionary ecology of partially private goods.
    Lerch BA; Smith DA; Koffel T; Bagby SC; Abbott KC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Nov; 18(11):e1010666. PubMed ID: 36318525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sanctions, Partner Recognition, and Variation in Mutualism.
    Yoder JB; Tiffin P
    Am Nat; 2017 Oct; 190(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 28937817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic drift opposes mutualism during spatial population expansion.
    Müller MJ; Neugeboren BI; Nelson DR; Murray AW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jan; 111(3):1037-42. PubMed ID: 24395776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recipient-Biased Competition for an Intracellularly Generated Cross-Fed Nutrient Is Required for Coexistence of Microbial Mutualists.
    McCully AL; LaSarre B; McKinlay JB
    mBio; 2017 Nov; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 29184014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism.
    Holland JN; DeAngelis DL
    Ecology; 2010 May; 91(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 20503862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral heterogeneity in quorum sensing can stabilize social cooperation in microbial populations.
    Zhao K; Liu L; Chen X; Huang T; Du L; Lin J; Yuan Y; Zhou Y; Yue B; Wei K; Chu Y
    BMC Biol; 2019 Mar; 17(1):20. PubMed ID: 30841874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.