These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33955322)

  • 1. Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes.
    Cook A; Hemler S; Sundaram V; Chanda A; Beschorner K
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 33955322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Traction performance across the life of slip-resistant footwear: Preliminary results from a longitudinal study.
    Hemler SL; Pliner EM; Redfern MS; Haight JM; Beschorner KE
    J Safety Res; 2020 Sep; 74():219-225. PubMed ID: 32951786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An observational ergonomic tool for assessing the worn condition of slip-resistant shoes.
    Beschorner KE; Siegel JL; Hemler SL; Sundaram VH; Chanda A; Iraqi A; Haight JM; Redfern MS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103140. PubMed ID: 32678768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of slip testing parameters on measured coefficient of friction.
    Beschorner KE; Redfern MS; Porter WL; Debski RE
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Nov; 38(6):773-80. PubMed ID: 17196925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective validity assessment of a friction prediction model based on tread outsole features of slip-resistant shoes.
    Beschorner KE; Nasarwanji M; Deschler C; Hemler SL
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jan; 114():104110. PubMed ID: 37595332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane.
    Manning DP; Jones C
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Apr; 32(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 11277511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in under-shoe traction and fluid drainage for progressively worn shoe tread.
    Hemler SL; Charbonneau DN; Iraqi A; Redfern MS; Haight JM; Moyer BE; Beschorner KE
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():35-42. PubMed ID: 31280808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Worn region size of shoe outsole impacts human slips: Testing a mechanistic model.
    Sundaram VH; Hemler SL; Chanda A; Haight JM; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109797. PubMed ID: 32423543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating the ability of a portable shoe-floor friction testing device, NextSTEPS, to predict human slips.
    Beschorner KE; Chanda A; Moyer BE; Reasinger A; Griffin SC; Johnston IM
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103854. PubMed ID: 35973317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.
    Beschorner KE; Iraqi A; Redfern MS; Cham R; Li Y
    Ergonomics; 2019 May; 62(5):668-681. PubMed ID: 30638144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.
    Iraqi A; Cham R; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():118-126. PubMed ID: 29866300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.
    Jones T; Iraqi A; Beschorner K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():304-312. PubMed ID: 29409649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive multiscale computational model of shoe-floor coefficient of friction.
    Moghaddam SRM; Acharya A; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    J Biomech; 2018 Jan; 66():145-152. PubMed ID: 29183657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating the Influence of Spatiotemporal Gait Characteristics on Shoe Wear Rate.
    Griffin SC; Hemler SL; Beschorner KE
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 34781847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In contrast to slip-resistant shoes, fluid drainage capacity explains friction performance across shoes that are not slip-resistant.
    Meehan EE; Vidic N; Beschorner KE
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103663. PubMed ID: 34894586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with worker slipping in limited-service restaurants.
    Courtney TK; Verma SK; Huang YH; Chang WR; Li KW; Filiaggi AJ
    Inj Prev; 2010 Feb; 16(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 20179034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shoe sole tread designs and outcomes of slipping and falling on slippery floor surfaces.
    Liu LW; Lee YH; Lin CJ; Li KW; Chen CY
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68989. PubMed ID: 23894388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gait kinetics impact shoe tread wear rate.
    Hemler SL; Sider JR; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    Gait Posture; 2021 May; 86():157-161. PubMed ID: 33735824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Floor/shoe slip resistance measurement.
    Chaffin DB; Woldstad JC; Trujillo A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 May; 53(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1609738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of natural shoe wear on traction performance: a longitudinal study.
    Hemler SL; Pliner EM; Redfern MS; Haight JM; Beschorner KE
    Footwear Sci; 2022; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 37701063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.