76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33955721)
1. Fractal geometry applied to the analysis of cervix biopsy.
Rodríguez-Velásquez JO; Barrios-Arroyave FA; Correa-Herrera SC; Grisales-Gutiérrez CE; Prieto-Bohórquez SE; Jattin-Balcázar JJ; Ruiz-Morales JJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):938-943. PubMed ID: 33955721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Fabrizii M; Moinfar F; Jelinek HF; Karperien A; Ahammer H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108457. PubMed ID: 25302712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geometrical nuclear diagnosis and total paths of cervical cell evolution from normality to cancer.
Velásquez JO; Bohórquez SE; Herrera SC; Cajeli DD; Velásquez DM; de Alonso MM
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 25879345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of using electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan) on the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing high grade squamous lesions of the cervix.
Muszynski C; Dupont E; Vaysse B; Lanta S; Tidy J; Sergent F; Gondry J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 46(9):669-673. PubMed ID: 28866125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the missed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma under the microscope in HSIL diagnosed by colposcopy-guided biopsy and related influencing factors].
Qian XY; You ZX; Cao QW; Zou BB; Xing Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):613-619. PubMed ID: 30293297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of clinical features of cervical precancerous lesions in postmenopausal women].
Liu YY; Guo RX; Li BJ; Wu Y; Bai J; Li LX; Wang CF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 33631883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy with guided biopsy in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early cervical cancer].
Madej J; Hanuszek K; Basta A; Was K; Pawlina W; Walicki W
Ginekol Pol; 1984 Jun; 55(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 6510741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An alternative approach for estimating the accuracy of colposcopy in detecting cervical precancer.
Davies KR; Cantor SB; Cox DD; Follen M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126573. PubMed ID: 25962157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fractal dimension in aspiration cytology smears of breast and cervical lesions.
Ohri S; Dey P; Nijhawan R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15131899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of PDD, colposcopy and cytology in the detection of cervical neoplastic lesions].
Szafińska-Dolata A; Kedzia W; Szafiński A; Józefiak A; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 19824459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardizing microcolposcopy. Assessing the criteria for evaluating the presence and degree of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Vancaillie T; Schmidt EH; Bonk U; Beller FK
J Reprod Med; 1987 Oct; 32(10):769-73. PubMed ID: 3681861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractal properties of biophysical models of pericellular brushes can be used to differentiate between cancerous and normal cervical epithelial cells.
Hernández Velázquez JD; Mejía-Rosales S; Gama Goicochea A
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2018 Oct; 170():572-577. PubMed ID: 29975905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytologic correlation between the Bethesda system and colposcopic biopsy].
González Sánchez JL; Pérez Guerrero C; Celorio Aguilera G; Chávez Barambila J; Ríos Montiel FA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Aug; 66():330-4. PubMed ID: 9745194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Kirkup W; Hill AS
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Jan; 87(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7362782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell surface as a fractal: normal and cancerous cervical cells demonstrate different fractal behavior of surface adhesion maps at the nanoscale.
Dokukin ME; Guz NV; Gaikwad RM; Woodworth CD; Sokolov I
Phys Rev Lett; 2011 Jul; 107(2):028101. PubMed ID: 21797643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
