These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33956486)

  • 1. Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.
    McCarthy D; Kenny P
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 94(1122):20201422. PubMed ID: 33956486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel quantitative measure of image quality in fluoroscopy.
    Kenny P; Costello D; McCarthy D; Kenny E
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():150-160. PubMed ID: 32146285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial technical and clinical evaluation of a new universal image receptor system.
    Bury RF; Cowen AR; Davies AG; Hawkridge P; Bruijns AJ; von Reth E
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 11305582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF THE QUASI-IDEAL OBSERVER FOR QUALITY CONTROL IN FLUOROSCOPY.
    Tesselaar E; Sandborg M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):360-4. PubMed ID: 26493947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
    Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
    Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of air kerma rate on threshold contrast in diagnostic fluoroscopy systems.
    Harrison RM; Day MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Nov; 28(11):1319-31. PubMed ID: 6657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of automatic dose rate control for flat panel imaging using a spatial frequency domain figure of merit.
    Dehairs M; Bosmans H; Desmet W; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6610-6630. PubMed ID: 28632501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
    Grewal RK; McLean ID
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.
    Ricciardello M; McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 7669021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gain and offset calibration reduces variation in exposure-dependent SNR among systems with identical digital flat-panel detectors.
    Willis CE; Vinogradskiy YY; Lofton BK; White RA
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4422-9. PubMed ID: 21859043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: X-ray to charge conversion gain and avalanche multiplication gain.
    Hunt DC; Kirby SS; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2464-71. PubMed ID: 12462710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.
    Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
    Berliner L; Buffa A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.