These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33956486)

  • 21. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New automated fluoroscopic systems for pediatric applications.
    Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; So JC; Dutta AK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):88-105. PubMed ID: 16421503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
    Kawashima H; Tanaka R; Ichikawa K; Matsubara K; Iida H; Sanada S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Operation logic and functionality of automatic dose rate and image quality control of conventional fluoroscopy.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1486-93. PubMed ID: 19544764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physical characteristics of a commercial electronic portal imaging device.
    Althof VG; de Boer JC; Huizenga H; Stroom JC; Visser AG; Swanenburg BN
    Med Phys; 1996 Nov; 23(11):1845-55. PubMed ID: 8947896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation dose reduction with frame rate conversion in X-ray fluoroscopic imaging systems with flat panel detector: basic study and clinical retrospective analysis.
    Sakai N; Tabei K; Sato J; Imae T; Suzuki Y; Takenaka S; Yano K; Abe O
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):985-992. PubMed ID: 29987416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a contrast-to-noise ratio-driven exposure control and a regular detector dose-driven exposure control in abdominal imaging in a clinical angiography system.
    Werncke T; Kemling M; Tashenov S; Hinrichs JB; Meine TC; Maschke SK; Kyriakou Y; Wacker FK; Meyer BC
    Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7641-7656. PubMed ID: 34651705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
    Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A digital fluoroscopic imaging device for radiotherapy localization.
    Munro P; Rawlinson JA; Fenster A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Mar; 18(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 2318698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment.
    Belanger B; Boudry J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16862403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A low-cost tracked C-arm (TC-arm) upgrade system for versatile quantitative intraoperative imaging.
    Amiri S; Wilson DR; Masri BA; Anglin C
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Jul; 9(4):695-711. PubMed ID: 24323400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient dose simulations for scanning-beam digital x-ray tomosynthesis of the lungs.
    Nelson G; Yoon S; Krishna G; Wilfley B; Fahrig R
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111917. PubMed ID: 24320450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.