These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33957189)

  • 41. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools.
    Wilson NH; Mjör IA
    J Dent; 2000 Jan; 28(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10666957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The transition from amalgam to other restorative materials in the U.S. predoctoral pediatric dentistry clinics.
    Kateeb ET; Warren JJ
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Aug; 5(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 31452952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Teaching posterior resin composites in UK and Ireland dental schools: do current teaching programmes match the expectation of clinical practice arrangements?
    Lynch CD; Blum IR; McConnell RJ; Frazier KB; Brunton PA; Wilson NHF
    Br Dent J; 2018 Jun; 224(12):967-972. PubMed ID: 29999043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Direct Posterior Restorations: A 13-Year Survey of Teaching Trends and Use of Materials.
    Zabrovsky A; Mahmoud R; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):E273-E279. PubMed ID: 30216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Trends in material choice for direct restorations by final year students from University College Cork 2004-2009.
    O'Sullivan CO; McKenna GJ; Burke FM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 22474934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Blum IR; Wilson N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 134(3):317-23; quiz 338-9. PubMed ID: 12699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dental educators' attitudes towards the teaching of dental amalgam.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong RHK
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 May; 24(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 31925893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in teaching programmes in United Kingdom and Irish Dental Schools.
    Blum IR; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 12526271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Amalgam Phase-Down Part 1: UK-Based Posterior Restorative Material and Technique Use.
    Bailey O; Vernazza CR; Stone S; Ternent L; Roche AG; Lynch C
    JDR Clin Trans Res; 2022 Jan; 7(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 33300416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Contemporary Evaluation on Posterior Direct Restoration Teaching among Undergraduates in Dental Schools in Malaysia.
    Alauddin MS; Mohammad N; Jaafar A; Abdul Fatah F; Ahmad AA
    Dent J (Basel); 2021 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 34677185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Repair versus replacement of defective composite restorations in dental schools in Germany.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 19(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 21780727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The management of defective resin composite restorations: current trends in dental school teaching in Japan.
    Lynch CD; Hayashi M; Seow LL; Blum IR; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23550913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques.
    Sabbagh J; McConnell RJ; McConnell MC
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():86-90. PubMed ID: 27889605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.