These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33957742)

  • 1. Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Tanishima S; Weishi L; Jianzhong H; Jie Z; Huilin Y; Nagashima H
    Asian Spine J; 2022 Jun; 16(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 33957742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire.
    Konno S; Kikuchi S; Tanaka Y; Yamazaki K; Shimada Y; Takei H; Yokoyama T; Okada M; Kokubun S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Oct; 8():102. PubMed ID: 17967201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain.
    Eguchi Y; Aoki Y; Yamashita M; Fujimoto K; Sato T; Abe K; Sato M; Yamanaka H; Toyoguchi T; Shimizu K; Orita S; Inage K; Shiga Y; Ohtori S
    Pain Ther; 2023 Apr; 12(2):461-473. PubMed ID: 36645650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical usefulness of assessing lumbar somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical article.
    Liu X; Konno S; Miyamoto M; Gembun Y; Horiguchi G; Ito H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19569944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for severe lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Yuan C; Liu C; Shen J; Tian H; Zheng W; Zhang C; Pan Y; Huang B; Jiang T; Zhang Z; Li C; Wang J; Zhou Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 33(7):801-806. PubMed ID: 31297995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Pratt RK; Fairbank JC; Virr A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 11805642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations between psychological factors and daily step count in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Kagotani R; Mera Y; Sumiya T; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Kitano T; Nakagawa Y
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2022 Oct; 38(10):1519-1527. PubMed ID: 33267720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the history and physical examination for hip osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Rainville J; Bono JV; Laxer EB; Kim DH; Lavelle JM; Indahl A; Borenstein DG; Haig AJ; Katz JN
    Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1009-1018. PubMed ID: 30708114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical classification criteria for neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. The N-CLASS criteria.
    Genevay S; Courvoisier DS; Konstantinou K; Kovacs FM; Marty M; Rainville J; Norberg M; Kaux JF; Cha TD; Katz JN; Atlas SJ
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):941-947. PubMed ID: 29031994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ammendolia C; Rampersaud YR; Southerst D; Ahmed A; Schneider M; Hawker G; Bombardier C; Côté P
    Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):386-394. PubMed ID: 30053521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Evaluation of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Based on Plantar Pressure Analysis.
    Wei W; Jin Y; Jiang M; Li L; Yan W; Wang H; Zhao J; Wang B; Sun G; Yang X
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Dec; 47(24):1746-1752. PubMed ID: 35917289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Tomkins-Lane CC; Battié MC
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2013; 26(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 23948821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a prostaglandin E1 derivative on the symptoms and quality of life of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Takahashi J; Kobayashi H; Wakabayashi S; Deguchi M; Ito H; Mogami Y; Tanikawa H; Nakagawa H; Moriya H; Ashizawa R; Takahara K; Kinoshita H; Tateiwa Y; Misawa H; Tsutsumimoto T; Nakakohji T; Yuzawa Y; Sawaumi A; Hidai Y; Matsuda S; Nakamura I; Toba S; Kamimura M; Nakane T; Hirabayashi H; Hashidate H; Ogihara N; Mukaiyama K; Kato H; Ohtsuka K
    J Orthop Sci; 2013 Mar; 18(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 23203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation Between Dural Sac Size in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhou Z; Jin Z; Zhang P; Shan B; Zhou Z; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Zhou X
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e866-e873. PubMed ID: 31715409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability.
    Kuittinen P; Sipola P; Saari T; Aalto TJ; Sinikallio S; Savolainen S; Kröger H; Turunen V; Leinonen V; Airaksinen O
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():348. PubMed ID: 25319184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of the efficacy of limaprost and pregabalin as single agents and in combination for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Kim HJ; Kim JH; Park YS; Suk KS; Lee JH; Park MS; Moon SH
    Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):756-63. PubMed ID: 27045252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.