204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33958777)
1. The reference genome of Miscanthus floridulus illuminates the evolution of Saccharinae.
Zhang G; Ge C; Xu P; Wang S; Cheng S; Han Y; Wang Y; Zhuang Y; Hou X; Yu T; Xu X; Deng S; Li Q; Yang Y; Yin X; Wang W; Liu W; Zheng C; Sun X; Wang Z; Ming R; Dong S; Ma J; Zhang X; Chen C
Nat Plants; 2021 May; 7(5):608-618. PubMed ID: 33958777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A framework genetic map for Miscanthus sinensis from RNAseq-based markers shows recent tetraploidy.
Swaminathan K; Chae WB; Mitros T; Varala K; Xie L; Barling A; Glowacka K; Hall M; Jezowski S; Ming R; Hudson M; Juvik JA; Rokhsar DS; Moose SP
BMC Genomics; 2012 Apr; 13():142. PubMed ID: 22524439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SSR-based genetic maps of Miscanthus sinensis and M. sacchariflorus, and their comparison to sorghum.
Kim C; Zhang D; Auckland SA; Rainville LK; Jakob K; Kronmiller B; Sacks EJ; Deuter M; Paterson AH
Theor Appl Genet; 2012 May; 124(7):1325-38. PubMed ID: 22274765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequencing of transcriptomes from two Miscanthus species reveals functional specificity in rhizomes, and clarifies evolutionary relationships.
Kim C; Lee TH; Guo H; Chung SJ; Paterson AH; Kim DS; Lee GJ
BMC Plant Biol; 2014 May; 14():134. PubMed ID: 24884969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High resolution genetic mapping by genome sequencing reveals genome duplication and tetraploid genetic structure of the diploid Miscanthus sinensis.
Ma XF; Jensen E; Alexandrov N; Troukhan M; Zhang L; Thomas-Jones S; Farrar K; Clifton-Brown J; Donnison I; Swaller T; Flavell R
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33821. PubMed ID: 22439001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Erianthus arundinaceus and Miscanthus sinensis: Comparative Genomics and Evolution of the Saccharum Complex.
Tsuruta SI; Ebina M; Kobayashi M; Takahashi W
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169992. PubMed ID: 28125648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole chloroplast genome and gene locus phylogenies reveal the taxonomic placement and relationship of Tripidium (Panicoideae: Andropogoneae) to sugarcane.
Lloyd Evans D; Joshi SV; Wang J
BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30683070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome biology of the paleotetraploid perennial biomass crop Miscanthus.
Mitros T; Session AM; James BT; Wu GA; Belaffif MB; Clark LV; Shu S; Dong H; Barling A; Holmes JR; Mattick JE; Bredeson JV; Liu S; Farrar K; Głowacka K; Jeżowski S; Barry K; Chae WB; Juvik JA; Gifford J; Oladeinde A; Yamada T; Grimwood J; Putnam NH; De Vega J; Barth S; Klaas M; Hodkinson T; Li L; Jin X; Peng J; Yu CY; Heo K; Yoo JH; Ghimire BK; Donnison IS; Schmutz J; Hudson ME; Sacks EJ; Moose SP; Swaminathan K; Rokhsar DS
Nat Commun; 2020 Oct; 11(1):5442. PubMed ID: 33116128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chromosome-scale assembly and analysis of biomass crop Miscanthus lutarioriparius genome.
Miao J; Feng Q; Li Y; Zhao Q; Zhou C; Lu H; Fan D; Yan J; Lu Y; Tian Q; Li W; Weng Q; Zhang L; Zhao Y; Huang T; Li L; Huang X; Sang T; Han B
Nat Commun; 2021 Apr; 12(1):2458. PubMed ID: 33911077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A BAC library of the SP80-3280 sugarcane variety (saccharum sp.) and its inferred microsynteny with the sorghum genome.
Figueira TR; Okura V; Rodrigues da Silva F; Jose da Silva M; Kudrna D; Ammiraju JS; Talag J; Wing R; Arruda P
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Apr; 5():185. PubMed ID: 22524198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sugarcane genome sequencing by methylation filtration provides tools for genomic research in the genus Saccharum.
Grativol C; Regulski M; Bertalan M; McCombie WR; da Silva FR; Zerlotini Neto A; Vicentini R; Farinelli L; Hemerly AS; Martienssen RA; Ferreira PC
Plant J; 2014 Jul; 79(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 24773339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CSGRqtl: A Comparative Quantitative Trait Locus Database for Saccharinae Grasses.
Zhang D; Paterson AH
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1533():257-266. PubMed ID: 27987176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative mapping in the Poaceae family reveals translocations in the complex polyploid genome of sugarcane.
Aitken KS; McNeil MD; Berkman PJ; Hermann S; Kilian A; Bundock PC; Li J
BMC Plant Biol; 2014 Jul; 14():190. PubMed ID: 25059596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofuel and energy crops: high-yield Saccharinae take center stage in the post-genomics era.
de Siqueira Ferreira S; Nishiyama MY; Paterson AH; Souza GM
Genome Biol; 2013 Jun; 14(6):210. PubMed ID: 23805917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular cytogenetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of four
Tang YM; Xiao L; Iqbal Y; Liao JF; Xiao LQ; Yi ZL; She CW
Comp Cytogenet; 2019; 13(3):211-230. PubMed ID: 31428293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of a Saccharum spontaneum with a basic chromosome number of x = 10 provides new insights on genome evolution in genus Saccharum.
Meng Z; Han J; Lin Y; Zhao Y; Lin Q; Ma X; Wang J; Zhang M; Zhang L; Yang Q; Wang K
Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jan; 133(1):187-199. PubMed ID: 31587087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast restriction enzyme site mutations in the Saccharinae Griseb. subtribe of the Andropogoneae Dumort. tribe.
Sobral BW; Braga DP; Lahood ES; Keim P
Theor Appl Genet; 1994 Feb; 87(7):843-53. PubMed ID: 24190471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Analysis of Miscanthus and Saccharum Reveals a Shared Whole-Genome Duplication but Different Evolutionary Fates.
Kim C; Wang X; Lee TH; Jakob K; Lee GJ; Paterson AH
Plant Cell; 2014 Jun; 26(6):2420-2429. PubMed ID: 24963058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nuclear DNA content in Miscanthus sp. and the geographical variation pattern in Miscanthus lutarioriparius.
Sheng J; Hu X; Zeng X; Li Y; Zhou F; Hu Z; Jin S; Diao Y
Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():34342. PubMed ID: 27698438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L.
Zhang J; Zhang X; Tang H; Zhang Q; Hua X; Ma X; Zhu F; Jones T; Zhu X; Bowers J; Wai CM; Zheng C; Shi Y; Chen S; Xu X; Yue J; Nelson DR; Huang L; Li Z; Xu H; Zhou D; Wang Y; Hu W; Lin J; Deng Y; Pandey N; Mancini M; Zerpa D; Nguyen JK; Wang L; Yu L; Xin Y; Ge L; Arro J; Han JO; Chakrabarty S; Pushko M; Zhang W; Ma Y; Ma P; Lv M; Chen F; Zheng G; Xu J; Yang Z; Deng F; Chen X; Liao Z; Zhang X; Lin Z; Lin H; Yan H; Kuang Z; Zhong W; Liang P; Wang G; Yuan Y; Shi J; Hou J; Lin J; Jin J; Cao P; Shen Q; Jiang Q; Zhou P; Ma Y; Zhang X; Xu R; Liu J; Zhou Y; Jia H; Ma Q; Qi R; Zhang Z; Fang J; Fang H; Song J; Wang M; Dong G; Wang G; Chen Z; Ma T; Liu H; Dhungana SR; Huss SE; Yang X; Sharma A; Trujillo JH; Martinez MC; Hudson M; Riascos JJ; Schuler M; Chen LQ; Braun DM; Li L; Yu Q; Wang J; Wang K; Schatz MC; Heckerman D; Van Sluys MA; Souza GM; Moore PH; Sankoff D; VanBuren R; Paterson AH; Nagai C; Ming R
Nat Genet; 2018 Nov; 50(11):1565-1573. PubMed ID: 30297971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
