185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33959237)
1. A Questionnaire of Digital Radiography and CBCT Use and Knowledge among Lithuanian Dentists.
Masyte V; Sefeldaite S; Venskutonis T
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2021; 12(1):e2. PubMed ID: 33959237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes and knowledge of paediatric dentists' on digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Giray FE; Peker S; Yalcinkaya SE; Kargul B; Aps J
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 30804585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part II - extraoral radiography: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists.
Svenson B; Ståhlnacke K; Karlsson R; Fält A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 30422025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey.
Hol C; Hellén-Halme K; Torgersen G; Nilsson M; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Apr; 73(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 25415368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Digital Imaging and Cone Beam Computed Tomography among Dental Practitioners in North Karnataka, India.
Chinna SK; Reddy NP; Thapaswini Y; Muppidi A; Pattepu SV; Sharma P
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1047-S1049. PubMed ID: 35017927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current trends in the adoption and education of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Lam M; Critchley S; Zhang A; Monsour P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200380. PubMed ID: 33449832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists.
Dölekoğlu S; Fişekçioğlu E; İlgüy M; İlgüy D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 21831978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative adoption of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography machines across Australia.
Zhang A; Critchley S; Monsour PA
Aust Dent J; 2016 Dec; 61(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 26881416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey.
Snel R; Van De Maele E; Politis C; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180045. PubMed ID: 29916726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography on periapical radiolucency detection in endodontically treated teeth.
Venskutonis T; Daugela P; Strazdas M; Juodzbalys G
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2014 Apr; 5(2):e1. PubMed ID: 25089173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Preference and Purpose of Utilisation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Compared to Orthopantomogram (OPG) by Dental Practitioners - A Cross-Sectional Study.
Garlapati K; Babu DBG; Chaitanya NCSK; Guduru H; Rembers A; Soni P
Pol J Radiol; 2017; 82():248-251. PubMed ID: 28533828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A survey on skills for cone beam computed tomography interpretation among endodontists for endodontic treatment procedure.
Janani K; Sandhya R
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):834-838. PubMed ID: 31939356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Swedish and Norwegian Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a Questionnaire Study.
Strindberg JE; Hol C; Torgersen G; Møystad A; Nilsson M; Näsström K; Hellén-Halme K
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2015; 6(4):e2. PubMed ID: 26904179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography.
Takeshita WM; Chicarelli M; Iwaki LC
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 26888242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of two different presurgical preparation methods for implant dentistry based on panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in cadavers.
Hu KS; Choi DY; Lee WJ; Kim HJ; Jung UW; Kim S
J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2012 Apr; 42(2):39-44. PubMed ID: 22586521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
