These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33959964)

  • 1. Matching, induction, and covariance with mixed response-contingent food and noncontingent food.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jul; 116(1):21-43. PubMed ID: 33959964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-reinforcer contiguity versus response-rate-reinforcer-rate covariance in rats' lever pressing: Support for a multiscale view.
    Baum WM; Aparicio CF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):530-548. PubMed ID: 32215922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matching theory and induction explain operant performance.
    Baum WM; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):390-418. PubMed ID: 32037561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background activities, induction, and behavioral allocation in operant performance.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 25130100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model-based estimates for operant selection.
    Borgstede M; Anselme P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2024 Jul; 122(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 38825891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice and rate-amount independence in a titration procedure.
    Baum WM
    Behav Processes; 2023 Mar; 206():104834. PubMed ID: 36706824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):101-24. PubMed ID: 22287807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noncontingent reinforcement competes with response performance.
    Kelley ME; Nadler CB; Rey C; Cowie S; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 28453222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 23460072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of induction in operant schedule performance.
    Baum WM
    Behav Processes; 2015 May; 114():26-33. PubMed ID: 25596517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement.
    Donny EC; Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Evans-Martin FF; Booth S; Gharib MA; Clements LA; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Aug; 169(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 12774186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-administered and noncontingent nicotine enhance reinforced operant responding in rats: impact of nicotine dose and reinforcement schedule.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Feb; 190(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16847680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: An overview.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Nov; 110(3):302-322. PubMed ID: 30302758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingent and noncontingent cocaine administration in rhesus monkeys: a comparison of the effects on the acquisition and performance of response sequences.
    Winsauer PJ; Moerschbaecher JM; Molina PE; Roussell AM
    Behav Pharmacol; 2003 Jul; 14(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 12838035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combinations of response-reinforcer relations in periodic and aperiodic schedules.
    Kuroda T; Cançado CR; Lattal KA; Elcoro M; Dickson CA; Cook JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Mar; 99(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 23319450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?
    Nevin JA; Smith LD; Roberts J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jul; 48(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 16812487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons.
    Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus effects on local preference: stimulus-response contingencies, stimulus-food pairing, and stimulus-food correlation.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 20676267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.