These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33963670)

  • 21. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature.
    Seife C
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 25664866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
    Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.
    Benson PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Oct; 97(7):487-9. PubMed ID: 26414359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
    Alfonso F
    Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Norwegian Coronavirus Disease 2019 (NO COVID-19) Pragmatic Open label Study to assess early use of hydroxychloroquine sulphate in moderately severe hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Lyngbakken MN; Berdal JE; Eskesen A; Kvale D; Olsen IC; Rangberg A; Jonassen CM; Omland T; Røsjø H; Dalgard O
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):485. PubMed ID: 32503662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Method for Improving the Integrity of Peer Review.
    Dadkhah M; Kahani M; Borchardt G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 28812275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
    Glonti K; Cauchi D; Cobo E; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017468. PubMed ID: 29061619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category.
    Campos-Varela I; Villaverde-Castañeda R; Ruano-Raviña A
    Gac Sanit; 2020; 34(5):430-434. PubMed ID: 31530483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hydroxychloroquine Controversies: Clinical Trials, Epistemology, and the Democratization of Science.
    Berlivet L; Löwy I
    Med Anthropol Q; 2020 Dec; 34(4):525-541. PubMed ID: 33210338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
    Frank E
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
    Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
    Tarkang EE; Bain LE
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
    Bonnet F; Samama CM
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and the Lancet.
    Marusić A; Lukić IK; Marusić M; McNamee D; Sharp D; Horton R
    Croat Med J; 2002 Jun; 43(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 12035133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.
    Christopher MM
    BMC Vet Res; 2022 Feb; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 35180878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.