These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33963761)

  • 1. Spatial heterogeneity in resources alters selective dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wilson AE; Siddiqui A; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2021 Jul; 75(7):1792-1804. PubMed ID: 33963761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.
    Colpitts J; Williscroft D; Sekhon HS; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29021319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.
    Singh A; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2017 Nov; 71(11):2714-2720. PubMed ID: 28840604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in
    Chandler CH; Mammel A; Dworkin I
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 May; 10(5):1541-1551. PubMed ID: 32122961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Persistence time of loss-of-function mutations at nonessential loci affecting eye color in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Yampolsky LY; Allen C; Shabalina SA; Kondrashov AS
    Genetics; 2005 Dec; 171(4):2133-8. PubMed ID: 16118190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
    López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in
    Malek HL; Long TAF
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(5):2651-2663. PubMed ID: 30891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment.
    Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
    Evolution; 2006 May; 60(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16817541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success.
    Maclellan K; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2009 Dec; 5(6):795-7. PubMed ID: 19625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Clark SC; Sharp NP; Rowe L; Agrawal AF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37351. PubMed ID: 22662148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.
    Yun L; Chen PJ; Singh A; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28679725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.
    Roze D
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 109(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 22588129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accelerated inbreeding depression suggests synergistic epistasis for deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Domínguez-García S; García C; Quesada H; Caballero A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Dec; 123(6):709-722. PubMed ID: 31477803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    MacLellan K; Kwan L; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Mar; 108(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 21792225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of deleterious mutations and age on recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):575-85. PubMed ID: 22276549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging.
    Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16780526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.