These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33964349)

  • 21. The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.
    Greenberg DR; Richardson MT; Tijerina JD; Bass MB; Eisenberg ML
    J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 30773501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency.
    Kamioka H; Tsutani K; Origasa H; Yoshizaki T; Kitayuguchi J; Shimada M; Wada Y; Takano-Ohmuro H
    Nutrients; 2019 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 31336978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel.
    Pilic A; Reda S; Jo CL; Burchett H; Bastías M; Campbell P; Gamage D; Henaff L; Kagina B; Külper-Schiek W; Lunny C; Marti M; Muloiwa R; Pieper D; Thomas J; Tunis MC; Younger Z; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2023 Mar; 41(12):1968-1978. PubMed ID: 36804216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Language Consideration and Methodological Transparency in "Systematic" Reviews of Animal Toxicity Studies.
    Alpi KM; Vo TA; Dorman DC
    Int J Toxicol; 2019; 38(2):135-145. PubMed ID: 30791753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.
    Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study.
    Tsoi AKN; Ho LTF; Wu IXY; Wong CHL; Ho RST; Lim JYY; Mao C; Lee EKP; Chung VCH
    Bone; 2020 Oct; 139():115541. PubMed ID: 32730932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines.
    Zhang X; Aixinjueluo QY; Li SY; Song LL; Lau CT; Tan R; Bian ZX
    Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):302. PubMed ID: 31796121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
    Tao H; Zhang Y; Li Q; Chen J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2245-2256. PubMed ID: 28875225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of conducting preclinical systematic reviews on researchers and their research: A mixed method case study.
    Menon JML; Ritskes-Hoitinga M; Pound P; van Oort E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260619. PubMed ID: 34898637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment for Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Field of Hepatology.
    Kim G; Cho YZ; Baik SK
    Gut Liver; 2015 Nov; 9(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 26503570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide.
    Johnston A; Kelly SE; Hsieh SC; Skidmore B; Wells GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():64-76. PubMed ID: 30529647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the treatment and management of male infertility.
    Bhambhvani HP; Greenberg DR; Eisenberg ML
    Andrology; 2021 May; 9(3):801-809. PubMed ID: 33432772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER).
    Whaley P; Aiassa E; Beausoleil C; Beronius A; Bilotta G; Boobis A; de Vries R; Hanberg A; Hoffmann S; Hunt N; Kwiatkowski CF; Lam J; Lipworth S; Martin O; Randall N; Rhomberg L; Rooney AA; Schünemann HJ; Wikoff D; Wolffe T; Halsall C
    Environ Int; 2020 Oct; 143():105926. PubMed ID: 32653802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review.
    Kamioka H; Tsutani K; Origasa H; Yoshizaki T; Kitayuguchi J; Shimada M; Tang W; Takano-Ohmuro H
    Nutr Res; 2017 Apr; 40():21-31. PubMed ID: 28473057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A study of the value of requesting information from drug manufacturers for systematic reviews; 9 years of experience from the drug effectiveness review project.
    McDonagh MS; Thakurta S; Peterson K
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):172. PubMed ID: 30348228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.