These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33964552)

  • 1. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Teece KH
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):584-595. PubMed ID: 33002968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
    Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels.
    Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Veerman ECI; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Plain B; Richter M; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Bhuiyan T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):718-731. PubMed ID: 33201048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance.
    Pielage H; Zekveld AA; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 33795615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.