225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33965977)
1. Artificial intelligence in prostate histopathology: where are we in 2021?
Oszwald A; Wasinger G; Pradere B; Shariat SF; Compérat EM
Curr Opin Urol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):430-435. PubMed ID: 33965977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies-Current Status and Next Steps.
Kartasalo K; Bulten W; Delahunt B; Chen PC; Pinckaers H; Olsson H; Ji X; Mulliqi N; Samaratunga H; Tsuzuki T; Lindberg J; Rantalainen M; Wählby C; Litjens G; Ruusuvuori P; Egevad L; Eklund M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):687-691. PubMed ID: 34393083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology.
Eminaga O; Abbas M; Kunder C; Tolkach Y; Han R; Brooks JD; Nolley R; Semjonow A; Boegemann M; West R; Long J; Fan RE; Bettendorf O
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5284. PubMed ID: 38438436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies.
Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A
Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of whole mount radical prostatectomy histopathology as the ground truth for artificial intelligence assisted prostate imaging.
Jager A; Postema AW; van der Linden H; Nooijen PTGA; Bekers E; Kweldam CF; Daures G; Zwart W; Mischi M; Beerlage HP; Oddens JR
Virchows Arch; 2023 Aug; 483(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 37407736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated systems comparable to expert pathologists for prostate cancer Gleason grading.
Thomas T
Nat Rev Urol; 2020 Mar; 17(3):131. PubMed ID: 32055009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulated Raman Histology Interpretation by Artificial Intelligence Provides Near-Real-Time Pathologic Feedback for Unprocessed Prostate Biopsies.
Mannas MP; Deng FM; Ion-Margineanu A; Jones D; Hoskoppal D; Melamed J; Pastore S; Freudiger C; Orringer DA; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2024 Mar; 211(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 38100831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.
Egevad L; Swanberg D; Delahunt B; Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M; Eklund M
Virchows Arch; 2020 Dec; 477(6):777-786. PubMed ID: 32542445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current State and Future Implications.
Satturwar S; Parwani AV
Adv Anat Pathol; 2024 Mar; 31(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 38179884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
