These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33965977)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence in prostate histopathology: where are we in 2021?
    Oszwald A; Wasinger G; Pradere B; Shariat SF; Compérat EM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):430-435. PubMed ID: 33965977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies-Current Status and Next Steps.
    Kartasalo K; Bulten W; Delahunt B; Chen PC; Pinckaers H; Olsson H; Ji X; Mulliqi N; Samaratunga H; Tsuzuki T; Lindberg J; Rantalainen M; Wählby C; Litjens G; Ruusuvuori P; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):687-691. PubMed ID: 34393083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer histopathology.
    Busby D; Grauer R; Pandav K; Khosla A; Jain P; Menon M; Haines GK; Cordon-Cardo C; Gorin MA; Tewari AK
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):37-47. PubMed ID: 36639335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology.
    Eminaga O; Abbas M; Kunder C; Tolkach Y; Han R; Brooks JD; Nolley R; Semjonow A; Boegemann M; West R; Long J; Fan RE; Bettendorf O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5284. PubMed ID: 38438436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
    Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
    Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies.
    Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A
    Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Their Current Role in the Identification and Comparison of Gleason Patterns in Prostate Cancer Histopathology: A Comprehensive Review.
    Khalid U; Gurung J; Doykov M; Kostov G; Hristov B; Uchikov P; Kraeva M; Kraev K; Doykov D; Doykova K; Valova S; Chervenkov L; Tilkiyan E; Eneva K
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 39410530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of whole mount radical prostatectomy histopathology as the ground truth for artificial intelligence assisted prostate imaging.
    Jager A; Postema AW; van der Linden H; Nooijen PTGA; Bekers E; Kweldam CF; Daures G; Zwart W; Mischi M; Beerlage HP; Oddens JR
    Virchows Arch; 2023 Aug; 483(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 37407736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated systems comparable to expert pathologists for prostate cancer Gleason grading.
    Thomas T
    Nat Rev Urol; 2020 Mar; 17(3):131. PubMed ID: 32055009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
    Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of prostate and breast cancer detection artificial intelligence algorithms for accurate histopathological diagnosis and grading: a retrospective study with a Japanese cohort.
    Lami K; Yoon HS; Parwani AV; Pham HHN; Tachibana Y; Linhart C; Grinwald M; Vecsler M; Fukuoka J
    Pathology; 2024 Aug; 56(5):633-642. PubMed ID: 38719771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulated Raman Histology Interpretation by Artificial Intelligence Provides Near-Real-Time Pathologic Feedback for Unprocessed Prostate Biopsies.
    Mannas MP; Deng FM; Ion-Margineanu A; Jones D; Hoskoppal D; Melamed J; Pastore S; Freudiger C; Orringer DA; Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2024 Mar; 211(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 38100831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
    da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
    J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.