231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33966155)
21. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.
Fallenberg EM; Dromain C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Krohn M; Singh JM; Ingold-Heppner B; Winzer KJ; Bick U; Renz DM
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 24048724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Xiang W; Rao H; Zhou L
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 32233072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography does not represent an influencing factor for breast cancer: A preliminary study.
Yu L; Wang Y; Xing D; Gong P; Chen Q; Lv Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(52):e23857. PubMed ID: 33350778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance.
Hobbs MM; Taylor DB; Buzynski S; Peake RE
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 25900704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits.
Houben IPL; Van de Voorde P; Jeukens CRLPN; Wildberger JE; Kooreman LF; Smidt ML; Lobbes MBI
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():31-37. PubMed ID: 28941757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation Between Enhancement Intensity in Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography and Types of Kinetic Curves in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Rudnicki W; Heinze S; Piegza T; Pawlak M; Kojs Z; Łuczyńska E
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Mar; 26():e920742. PubMed ID: 32173716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Clinical Applications.
Bhimani C; Matta D; Roth RG; Liao L; Tinney E; Brill K; Germaine P
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 27773458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.
Fallenberg EM; Schmitzberger FF; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Mann RM; Renz DM; Bick U; Hamm B; Dromain C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2752-2764. PubMed ID: 27896471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contextual Features and Information Bottleneck-Based Multi-Input Network for Breast Cancer Classification from Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography.
Li X; Cui J; Song J; Jia M; Zou Z; Ding G; Zheng Y
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36553140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in women presenting with palpable breast findings.
Sorin V; Faermann R; Yagil Y; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Halshtok-Neiman O; Ben-David MA; Sklair-Levy M
Clin Imaging; 2020 May; 61():99-105. PubMed ID: 32014818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women.
Luczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Dyczek S; Blecharz P; Rys J; Reinfuss M
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 25469079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review.
Patel BK; Lobbes MBI; Lewin J
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):70-79. PubMed ID: 29317041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results.
Łuczyńska E; Niemiec J; Hendrick E; Heinze S; Jaszczyński J; Jakubowicz J; Sas-Korczyńska B; Rys J
Med Sci Monit; 2016 Oct; 22():3886-3893. PubMed ID: 27768681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).
James JJ; Tennant SL
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):715-723. PubMed ID: 29937340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
