These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33966783)
21. Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem. Resnik DB; Elliott KC J Gen Philos Sci; 2023; 54(2):259-286. PubMed ID: 36843654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to Assess the Epistemic Wrongness of Sponsorship Bias? The Case of Manufactured Certainty. Leefmann J Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():599909. PubMed ID: 34027299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Addiction and its sciences-philosophy. Foddy B Addiction; 2011 Jan; 106(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 20955490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Human gene therapy: down the slippery slope? Holtug N Bioethics; 1993 Oct; 7(5):402-19. PubMed ID: 11656251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Epistemic Risk in Representation. Harvard S; Winsberg E Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2022; 32(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 35431275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Technological medicine and the autonomy of man. Hofmann B Med Health Care Philos; 2002; 5(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12168991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tacit knowledge as the unifying factor in evidence based medicine and clinical judgement. Thornton T Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2006 Mar; 1(1):E2. PubMed ID: 16759426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the Psychology of Argument: A Structural Analysis of Former Muslims' Postings Within Malaysian Social Media. Hashmi UM; Rashid RA; Munir R Front Psychol; 2021; 12():740558. PubMed ID: 34744911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transparency and secrecy in citizen science: Lessons from herping. Quinn A Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Feb; 85():208-217. PubMed ID: 33966777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The diverse aims of science. Potochnik A Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2015 Oct; 53():71-80. PubMed ID: 26386532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists). Waters CK Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper. Picardi N Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Three arguments for scientific freedom]. Bayertz K ALTEX; 2000; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 11085860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The role of non-epistemic values in engineering models. Diekmann S; Peterson M Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Mar; 19(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 21822897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Philosophical import of non-epistemic values in clinical trials and data interpretation. Varghese J Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Mar; 41(2):14. PubMed ID: 30900061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Legitimizing Values in Regulatory Science. Fernández Pinto M; Hicks DJ Environ Health Perspect; 2019 Mar; 127(3):35001. PubMed ID: 30870036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On justifying arguments of species membership. Rothhaar M Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 31577848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Challenging the belief in simple solutions: The need for epistemic practices in professional work. Nerland M; Hasu M Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 55(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 32683716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]